NCAA 14 Wishlist

I've noticed that too. Its like 50/50 white/red, when it should be 1/3 at most.

They also have too many visitors in every stadium. I know they're just keeping with the official visitor-ticket numbers, but not that many visitors always show up in every stadium.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
GSG5545 said:
iowahuskers said:
Bye Bye Big XII said:
hosker said:
Does anybody know if they've added the east-side expansion on this game?
Click to expand...
I think they did all the stadium imagery last year. If that's the case I don't think the east stadium expansion will be included, although I would love to be surprised.
Click to expand...
That would be awesome if they do. I also hope they change it so our stands arent mostly white like they have been in the past few years. Not sure if any one else has noticed this as well.
Click to expand...
White people?
Click to expand...
thats-racist.gif


 
Here’s how the Big Ten teams stack up:

1. Ohio State 95 (97 offense, 92 defense)

T-2. Michigan 91 (91, 92)

T-2. Michigan State 91 (90, 93)

T-4. Iowa 88 (88, 90)

T-4. Nebraska 88 (91, 85)

T-4. Wisconsin 88 (88, 88)

7. Northwestern 86 (86, 87)

T-8. Penn State 84 (86, 85)

T-8. Purdue 84 (84, 85)

10. Illinois 83 (86, 80)

11. Indiana 81 (83, 82)

12. Minnesota 79 (79, 80)

http://btn.com/2013/06/11/ncaa-14-team-ratings-raise-some-eyebrows/

dafuq??????

 
Rollin said:
HuskerNMO said:
Confirmed that last years alternate N on the chest with black helmets are in
Click to expand...
That'll be pretty cool.... I didn't buy last years game (I think its the first year I've never purchased), so how does the zone read work? The year before last it sucked video game a$$....
Click to expand...
A notable improvement in the E3 videos I've seen is that the CPU teams run the option much better and make more logical decisions on when to keep or when to pitch. I'm guessing Heisman difficulty this year is going to be significantly harder than in any edition before.

Looks like the zone read is improved as well.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If Ohio State's offense is a 97 then ours is at least a 95. I didn't purchase last years edition but in previous years our ratings turned out to be more accurate than not. Taylor has always been way too slow though, and has never had the acceleration he actually has in the real world. Ameer better be something like Dempsey was at Florida or that guy at Colorado. Small quick and shifty, I always had trouble with those guys breaking off big runs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
For some reason last year last year I remember JT and KBell not being very fast or quick in the game so I hope they change that. I also noticed that AA ins't even in our top ten which means he can only be an 85/84 overall. I just don't understand how we can be the same as Iowa overall. Our offense should be mid 90s too.

 
Who the hell do they hire to formulate the teams and score them!? It's a bunch of crap that Iowa is matched up with the Huskers. Taylor better have increased acceleration this year...b/c the game actually may be worth the buy....MAYBE.

 
Back
Top