krill
New member
Why would you be at all concerned when these three groups played a major role in crafting the bill? If they wanted it stopped, any one of these groups has the clout to make changes.My biggest hesitation is that I believe, for them to get costs under control, they are going to have to get very heavy handed in controlling what providers, drug makers, insurers, etc. can charge. And, as soon as they do that, those industries and occupations are going to be a lot less desirable. Pretty soon we'll have under educated disgruntled health system workers with longer wait times and meddling bureaucrats. Sorry, but that's how I see it playing out. Hope I'm wrong.
It's not like the bill did anything radical like say, increasing the number of primary care residency slots, aggressively pursing reimbursement rates to decrease unnecessary and expensive procedures, granting government more power to negotiate prices for drugs they are paying for, or introducing a public health care option to compete with the private insurers. None of that happened, and none of major players (AMA, providers, insurers, pharma) are throwing lobbying dollars at stopping implementation.