Douschebag Hall of Fame

[It'sNotAFakeID]

Man it takes a whole new level of stupidity to see someone not understand their own thoughts.

 

[GBRedneck]

 

[Saunders]

I tried to read this argument and now my head hurts. I'm going to bed now.

 

[GBRedneck]

Man it takes a whole new level of stupidity to see someone not understand their own thoughts.

Well then you are certainly qualified to see that.

 

[Redux]

Tell me, say we hire Frost at the end of this season. He goes 4-8 in 2016 and 6-6 in 2017.

Are you still all in with bells on?

 

[GBRedneck]

Tell me, say we hire Frost at the end of this season. He goes 4-8 in 2016 and 6-6 in 2017.

Are you still all in with bells on?

I'd probably lose the bells, but I would probably still be in. Depends a lot on other details to say for sure.

If Frost comes in next season, that means Riley must've lost out or gone 3-9 at best. So, 4-8 in 2016 would be an improvement and 6-6 would be another improvement. I wouldn't be happy about it, but at least he's not going backwards.

 

[Redux]

Tell me, say we hire Frost at the end of this season. He goes 4-8 in 2016 and 6-6 in 2017.

Are you still all in with bells on?

I'd probably lose the bells, but I would probably still be in. Depends a lot on other details to say for sure.
If Frost comes in next season, that means Riley must've lost out or gone 3-9 at best. So, 4-8 in 2016 would be an improvement and 6-6 would be another improvement. I wouldn't be happy about it, but at least he's not going backwards.

So really, it's more along the lines of you wanting Frost here and not Riley. Records aren't what you are concerned with here.

 

[GBRedneck]

Tell me, say we hire Frost at the end of this season. He goes 4-8 in 2016 and 6-6 in 2017.

Are you still all in with bells on?

I'd probably lose the bells, but I would probably still be in. Depends a lot on other details to say for sure.
If Frost comes in next season, that means Riley must've lost out or gone 3-9 at best. So, 4-8 in 2016 would be an improvement and 6-6 would be another improvement. I wouldn't be happy about it, but at least he's not going backwards.

So really, it's more along the lines of you wanting Frost here and not Riley. Records aren't what you are concerned with here.

Huh? I just explained that improvement in record would keep me on board with Frost. With Riley, we're seeing the opposite. So W/L records are exactly what I'm concerned with.

See, a W/L record of 9-3 followed by a 3-9 is not "improvement". The ones outlined in my response are at least small improvements.

 

[Redux]

Tell me, say we hire Frost at the end of this season. He goes 4-8 in 2016 and 6-6 in 2017.

Are you still all in with bells on?

I'd probably lose the bells, but I would probably still be in. Depends a lot on other details to say for sure.
If Frost comes in next season, that means Riley must've lost out or gone 3-9 at best. So, 4-8 in 2016 would be an improvement and 6-6 would be another improvement. I wouldn't be happy about it, but at least he's not going backwards.

So really, it's more along the lines of you wanting Frost here and not Riley. Records aren't what you are concerned with here.

Huh? I just explained that improvement in record would keep me on board with Frost. With Riley, we're seeing the opposite. So W/L records are exactly what I'm concerned with.
See, a W/L record of 9-3 followed by a 3-9 is not "improvement". The ones outlined in my response are at least small improvements.

Mike Riley didn't go 9-3 here last year. And we don't know what his record this year will be.

You can not use the former coaches last record to compare the new coaches first record, you just can't.

Well, I guess you can, but that would be assinine.

 

[Redux]

And it is adorable you actually think Riley going 3-9 this year, getting fired and replaced by Frost who then goes 4-8 is actually "improvement".

 

[ADS]

To everyone who wants Scott Frost to come here as HC. It would literally be the same thing when we hired Bo. The guy has zero experience running a program. And now without a QB like Mariotta he's on the hot seat.

 

[GBRedneck]

To everyone who wants Scott Frost to come here as HC. It would literally be the same thing when we hired Bo. The guy has zero experience running a program. And now without a QB like Mariotta he's on the hot seat.

Funny that you tout experience with Sub500's results so far.

 

[GBRedneck]

Tell me, say we hire Frost at the end of this season. He goes 4-8 in 2016 and 6-6 in 2017.

Are you still all in with bells on?

I'd probably lose the bells, but I would probably still be in. Depends a lot on other details to say for sure.
If Frost comes in next season, that means Riley must've lost out or gone 3-9 at best. So, 4-8 in 2016 would be an improvement and 6-6 would be another improvement. I wouldn't be happy about it, but at least he's not going backwards.

So really, it's more along the lines of you wanting Frost here and not Riley. Records aren't what you are concerned with here.

Huh? I just explained that improvement in record would keep me on board with Frost. With Riley, we're seeing the opposite. So W/L records are exactly what I'm concerned with.
See, a W/L record of 9-3 followed by a 3-9 is not "improvement". The ones outlined in my response are at least small improvements.

Mike Riley didn't go 9-3 here last year. And we don't know what his record this year will be.

You can not use the former coaches last record to compare the new coaches first record, you just can't.

Well, I guess you can, but that would be assinine.

I feel like I'm getting stupid through osmosis just by responding to your posts. So carry on without me. HAND

 

[ADS]

To everyone who wants Scott Frost to come here as HC. It would literally be the same thing when we hired Bo. The guy has zero experience running a program. And now without a QB like Mariotta he's on the hot seat.

Funny that you tout experience with Sub500's results so far.

So you know for sure that Frost would have us above .500?

 

[RedRedJarvisRedwine]

Tell me, say we hire Frost at the end of this season. He goes 4-8 in 2016 and 6-6 in 2017.

Are you still all in with bells on?

I'd probably lose the bells, but I would probably still be in. Depends a lot on other details to say for sure.
If Frost comes in next season, that means Riley must've lost out or gone 3-9 at best. So, 4-8 in 2016 would be an improvement and 6-6 would be another improvement. I wouldn't be happy about it, but at least he's not going backwards.

So really, it's more along the lines of you wanting Frost here and not Riley. Records aren't what you are concerned with here.

Huh? I just explained that improvement in record would keep me on board with Frost. With Riley, we're seeing the opposite. So W/L records are exactly what I'm concerned with.
See, a W/L record of 9-3 followed by a 3-9 is not "improvement". The ones outlined in my response are at least small improvements.

Mike Riley didn't go 9-3 here last year. And we don't know what his record this year will be.

You can not use the former coaches last record to compare the new coaches first record, you just can't.

Well, I guess you can, but that would be assinine.

I feel like I'm getting stupid through osmosis just by responding to your posts. So carry on without me. HAND

Are you just trying to be ironic?