CALIBRASKA CONNECTION

[Undone]

Commits from California:  

2015:  2

2016:  4

2017:  3

2018:  1

11 out of 70

/thread, great research.

I understand why we have this thread, but the content is of the stuff you'd expect in the offseason when there's nothing to talk about. It's pretty insane argue on and on about the "toughness and quality of California recruits." As far as drawing any conclusions about recruiting and a team's performance, all we can really do in my opinion is to look at any given coach's recruiting rankings, look at the output of the product on the field, and draw potential conclusions about correlations between the two.

But speculating on the quality of the recruit based on where they're from is borderline ridiculous. To such a ridiculous extent that I'd almost say "jessica" is trolling here. I can't imagine anyone actually buying into that concept, seriously.

 

[Pedro Guerrero]

Commits from California:  

2015:  2

2016:  4

2017:  3

2018:  1

11 out of 70

Don't bring facts into this argument.

 

[ADS]

Commits from California:  

2015:  2

2016:  4

2017:  3

2018:  1

11 out of 70

 

[Isle of View]

Commits from California:  

2015:  2

2016:  4

2017:  3

2018:  1

11 out of 70

That's pretty weak results for all the efforts they put into the Calibraska movement.

 

[StPaulHusker]

That's pretty weak results for all the efforts they put into the Calibraska movement.

You don't know how much effort they put in versus any other place.

 

[ADS]

That's pretty weak results for all the efforts they put into the Calibraska movement.

Did they ever say “we are only going to recruit California”?  Recruiting has, and always will be, a national thing for Nebraska.

 

[StPaulHusker]

.

 

[Isle of View]

You don't know how much effort they put in versus any other place.

 

[jessica0]

Commits from California:  

2015:  2

2016:  4

2017:  3

2018:  1

11 out of 70

Yep, that is another reason why this Calibraska crap is nothing but hype. They spend way too much time offering Cali kids and going out there for the visits for little return. 

 

[jessica0]

That's pretty weak results for all the efforts they put into the Calibraska movement.

Exactly. They even made Twitter statements and shirts about it for crying out loud. Just a terrible fit for recruiting to Nebraska for actual results yielded on NSD. i wished a much bigger focus would be put into IL, MO and Texas. 

 

[Cdog923]

Yep, that is another reason why this Calibraska crap is nothing but hype. They spend way too much time offering Cali kids and going out there for the visits for little return. 

 

[Xmas32]

Dang St. Paul Husker is going all Keisha from New Jack City on folks.  Rock a bye baby.

 

[Undone]

Yep, that is another reason why this Calibraska crap is nothing but hype. They spend way too much time offering Cali kids and going out there for the visits for little return. 

The only thing that actually matters is the examination of a coach's recruiting rankings and the correlations to the output on the field. 

The only question that really matters all that much is, will our next head coach recruit better than Riley? That's all that matters as it pertains to questions asked in the original post and the landof10 article.

 

[StPaulHusker]

Exactly. They even made Twitter statements and shirts about it for crying out loud. Just a terrible fit for recruiting to Nebraska for actual results yielded on NSD. i wished a much bigger focus would be put into IL, MO and Texas. 

Ah yes.  Someone coined a hashtag #Calibraska and now it's the football coach's fault

A t shirt company made Calibraska t shirts and a coach wore one.  What a jerk

 

[StPaulHusker]

Dang St. Paul Husker is going all Keisha from New Jack City on folks.  Rock a bye baby.

New Jack City references will always get a +1 from me