This is one area I hope Frost changes as it relates to scheme. Against some of the B1G teams (top 5-6) there is nothing wrong with having a lead blocker (Oz) and Washington in the backfield. (not to pigeon hole Oz as a lead blocker) Spread the D out through motioning one out. Add the element of the D having to cue on two backs in an option or dive. I'd also like a set of plays that we could use in short yardage where the QB lines up under center. Even use it on 1st and 10 to keep the D honest.
I also haven't seen any of the concentrated effort to spread out the D like was seen at UCF. The whole "go where they aren't" philosophy. Frustrating that so many times this year, it appears that we are playing checkers while opposing teams are playing chess. Like
@huskerfan74 said, it could very well be that Frost can't use 100% of the play book. I think that might be true with a combination of questionable OL play, no receiver not named JD or Stan really stepping up and limited TE involvement.....
I'd like more accountability from the staff. I'm tired of the 1 more play, 1 less penalty etc..A little responsibility for allowing a 1 dimensional team to drive 99 yards...With Mo on the sidelines.........(Saw that series we ran a 3-3-5 so that might be the reason)
But if an inside LB is coming out, it's not gonna be Mo...
It's just frustrating as I, like most, thought that the mere presence of Frost was worth "X" number of wins....I didn't think we were this completely void of talent or so undisciplined as to lead or close to leading the most penalties per game. Throw in 6 games with no real punt return and blocks in the back......