Maurice Washington Faces Charges

Stumpy1 said:
Thank You...

The whole app monitoring thing reminded me of something that happened to me.  I did not know this at first but my wife had her phone and Ipad linked together and she could message from both at anytime.  One night I was on her ipad messing around and she got a message from a really close friend of ours.  The message popped up saying  " I got them done".  I went ahead and looked to see what it was about and you guessed it,  she sent my wife a whole picture collage of her new boobs.  
Click to expand...


You wanna go ahead and forward those to me that would be great

 
Moiraine said:
I was under the impression we were similar ages. Did smart phones exist when you were 18?

I am 100% sure I would have received d!(k pics from my 18 year old boyfriend when I was 16 if smartphones had existed back then.
Click to expand...
I didn’t have a smartphone but I did have a digital camera, computer, and internet and was willing to put some work in to attain 8.8/10 rating on ratemyrack.com. As I’ve said above, my 18-24 years would have been much worse had I come of age in 2010+.  

 
The Dude said:
Case in point.  Heh.

I was 18 in the internet age.  You know what the easiest thing in the world was?  Not being in possession of child pornography.
Click to expand...


Did you ever save any picture you saw on the internet ever?

You've been in possession of "child porn".

 
Dr. Strangelove said:
According to NBC Bay Area, where the story first broke, he's being charged with a misdemeanor and a felony.

We'll see if those charges stick, but that's not a good look. 

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investigations/University-of-Nebraska-Football-Player-Maurice-Washington-Faces-Revenge-Porn-Child-Porn-Charges-Over-Video-of-Bay-Area-Teen-505666711.html
Click to expand...


The case was referred to a judge in mid-December. Unless it happened recently, charges have not yet been filed. They're anticipating charges in that article, likely because a source in the DA has told them they're pending, but until the judge issues the order, no charges.

 
knapplc said:
The case was referred to a judge in mid-December. Unless it happened recently, charges have not yet been filed. They're anticipating charges in that article, likely because a source in the DA has told them they're pending, but until the judge issues the order, no charges.
Click to expand...
That's a fair point.

 
Dr. Strangelove said:
According to NBC Bay Area, where the story first broke, he's being charged with a misdemeanor and a felony.

We'll see if those charges stick, but that's not a good look. 

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investigations/University-of-Nebraska-Football-Player-Maurice-Washington-Faces-Revenge-Porn-Child-Porn-Charges-Over-Video-of-Bay-Area-Teen-505666711.html
Click to expand...


Girl: "Please don't use my last name."

News channel: "No problem!"

Girl: "Thanks!"

News channel: *proceeds to paste her picture in the article*

 
There is something inherently wrong with considering one 16 year old in possession of another 16 year old's (their girlfriend or boyfriend) picture/video as being guilty of child pornography. We give these kids smart phones, oftentimes before they are even teenagers, and then some act shocked and disgusted and outraged when immature people do immature things with that technology. Yet some of these same people simply call laws against marijuana stupid and ill advised. Tar and feather one while ignoring/laughing about the other. I think I'll need a much taller horse to see the world the way some of you do.

 
JJ Husker said:
There is something inherently wrong with considering one 16 year old in possession of another 16 year old's (their girlfriend or boyfriend) picture/video as being guilty of child pornography. We give these kids smart phones, oftentimes before they are even teenagers, and then some act shocked and disgusted and outraged when immature people do immature things with that technology. Yet some of these same people simply call laws against marijuana stupid and ill advised. Tar and feather one while ignoring/laughing about the other. I think I'll need a much taller horse to see the world the way some of you do.
Click to expand...
I have been having the same response when someone calls this child porn....a 60 yr old man can watch dirty videos of 18 yr olds all day every day and never have a legal issue but an 18 yr old senior in HS cant have a 15 or 16 yr old picture or video of his gf/ex or whatever. One seems way more disgusting to me. 

 
Hedley Lamarr said:
I have been having the same response when someone calls this child porn....a 60 yr old man can watch dirty videos of 18 yr olds all day every day and never have a legal issue but an 18 yr old senior in HS cant have a 15 or 16 yr old picture or video of his gf/ex or whatever. One seems way more disgusting to me. 
Click to expand...




I'm guessing many of the people throwing around the label trying to force it to tell the entire story are grown ups who watch 18 year old porn stars. If we're talking about morality, I don't see much of a difference.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top