Maurice Washington Faces Charges

PasstheDamnBallGuy said:
I've been kind of wondering something. One source that showed the full conversation showed her requesting him to send the video again. Is that not a request for a video of CP? If it was the girl not really an issue but if that was actually the mom who has access to her texts and she was trying to get proof can she not be legally help responsible for that?
Click to expand...


It's another interesting question. I quoted that exchange a few pages ago.  If she's offended by the video, why ask him to send it again? Was she doing it because she was taunting him back (because he seemed to be taunting her), was she trying to get evidence, was that not even her and it was the police using her phone?  Hard to say.

 
C N Red said:
Wth are you talking about? You put allegedly in quotes and basically make the point. People arent defending the action, they are defending intent and people crucifying him before we know intent and real truth.
Click to expand...
By trying to explain it away, through any number of ways I have read on the 20+ pages of this thread, that is defending actions and the person who is being questioned.  

 
10_point_buck said:
By trying to explain it away, through any number of ways I have read on the 20+ pages of this thread, that is defending actions and the person who is being questioned.  
Click to expand...
That's a really strange way of looking at trying to gain facts in what happened before you pass final judgement.  

I guess it's best to jump to conclusions before you have facts.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
10_point_buck said:
By trying to explain it away, through any number of ways I have read on the 20+ pages of this thread, that is defending actions and the person who is being questioned.  
Click to expand...


I think maybe a couple of people have done that, but you're really not paying attention to the conversation if you think that's a common theme throughout this thread.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Saunders said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that the two boys in the video were never charged with assault, and that all three of them were expelled after the incident. Then, one of the boys was charged for distributing the video? It seems like it was never being view through the lens of sexual assault until after Washington was involved? So, does that mean they go back and prosecute the two boys now?
Click to expand...




The family says they plan on doing that. I find it highly unlikely/impossible she could ever prove her claim.

The rest is not directed at you. 

Like I said previously, there are reasons to doubt her.

Where I got pissed off is the ignorant people claiming that it can’t have been sexual assault because it doesn’t look like sexual assault and because she waited to say it was. Neither of those are legitimate arguments.

And again, none of this is relevant for Washington. What’s relevant is that he likely didn’t know it was assault or alleged assauly. 

 
Moiraine said:
The family says they plan on doing that. I find it highly unlikely/impossible she could ever prove her claim.

The rest is not directed at you. 

Like I said previously, there are reasons to doubt her.

Where I got pissed off is the ignorant people claiming that it can’t have been sexual assault because it doesn’t look like sexual assault and because she waited to say it was. Neither of those are legitimate arguments.

And again, none of this is relevant for Washington. What’s relevant is that he likely didn’t know it was assault or alleged assauly. 
Click to expand...
Likely didn't know? He KNEW it wasn't assault. If your daughter was sexually assaulted you don't get expelled from school nor press charges. That is flat out common sense 

 
BIG ERN said:
Likely didn't know? He KNEW it wasn't assault. If your daughter was sexually assaulted you don't get expelled from school nor press charges. That is flat out common sense 
Click to expand...




Wrong. 

I posted the legal definition of sexual assault earlier in the topic. You should go look at it and educate yourself. 

It’s like the people making this awful argument have never heard of blackmail or coercian or threats. 

FFS there are porn videos online that are made with people who were trafficked for sex. They don’t all look like your definition of rape. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I hope when a kid of a member on here does something stupid people dont jump and crucify them. Also hope people take seriously sex assault reports. But this story is far from cut and dry, except for most likely Mo sent the video. There are soooo many factors going on here, and many of them dealing with the minds of teenagers. Just telling you all now, this kind of stuff is going to become prevalent with electronics and social media. Ive been teaching my daughter for a long time now about this stuff and what it can do to your life and that you need to be careful and shes only 12, doesnt have a phone yet, and very limited on internet. And i am already worried about it and the future when she does get a phone.

 
Back
Top