Ohio state, penn state, Wisconsin, Michigan and Iowa twice? I don’t see many wins there
Doesn’t sound like a fun season, but I guarantee we’d be much improved next year.Ohio state, penn state, Wisconsin, Michigan and Iowa twice? I don’t see many wins there
Super surprised that Wisky would have voted no with the walk in the park schedule they were handed out of the gate. Getting them to come back and say yes may be tricky as this new 6 team home and home thing looks to be, shall we say, slightly more difficult.According to Zach Smith (ex ohio st wr coach) on his podcast, the schools that voted to play were Nebraska, Iowa, Purdue, Ohio St, and Penn St. The surprise no votes were Michigan and Wisconsin and had they voted yes it could have been enough to change the outcome.
This thread went off the rails once the names Jeff Snook and Zac Smith started showing up in this thread. Now it is ok to trust these people?
In your opinion, are college athletes who live in a bubble, that have a fairly regimented schedule while in said bubble more likely to attend online courses than students who really have no one monitoring their attendance and dont live in a structured environment
Tell us more about Jeff Snook. I know he's a Buckeye blogger. Is he trustworthy, or in the same category as Zach Smith?
We will grab at straws until the bitter end...This thread went off the rails once the names Jeff Snook and Zac Smith started showing up in this thread. Now it is ok to trust these people?
He reported about the Smith situation at OSU and his accounts were much different than ESPN and others. I really don't know how trustworthy he is, but you can read about his reports by searching for Jeff Snook and Zac Smith. Just seeing the two names together doesn't really remind me of good times.
He says he has connections, which are always anonymous. For instance, it's ludicrous to think that any members of the Board were talking to him after the Urban situation, and that was evidenced by the fact that their subsequent actions towards Drake (glowing revue and maximum bonus) directly contradicted what his allegedly iron clad sources on the Board had been telling him. He was absolutely wrong about the fundraising effect of the Urban suspension and retirement. He was absolutely wrong about Tressel being any kind of candidate for President.
What Snook does is throw s#!t at the wall (uniformly in line with the desires of his mouth breathing followers on Ozone) with the "my sources tell me" background, and if it sticks, he comes off as some serious insider type guy. If it turns out to be bulls#!t, everyone forgets, and he just moves on to the next "my sources tell me" story line.
Perhaps he has some athletic department sources with regards to things like recruiting or the preseason depth chart. With regards to sources on important university-wide decision making coming out of Bricker Hall or the Board much less the Big Ten offices in Rosemont, I think he's utterly full of s#!t, and his track record of failure backs me up on this.
This thread went off the rails once the names Jeff Snook and Zac Smith started showing up in this thread. Now it is ok to trust these people?