Not sure the Ds are the answer. This is making the administration look worse. And...if they want to promote less stringent border guidelines, the best way to accomplish that is to have LESS of a problem at the border...not a worse one.Hard to say. There are angles for "both sides".
I think first and foremost it would be the Rs, so they can tout the ineffectiveness of Biden's efforts. But let's not discount the Ds using it to promote less stringent border guidelines by strumming the heartstrings for these tired hungry and poor refugees
That said, I highly doubt this is organized by anyone in the US.
100%I'm not sure that's so easily discounted. Latin America has been a CIA playground for a LONG time. The term "Banana Republic" was spawned there due to US intervention.
I’m not sure republican politicians agree with this behind closed doors.Of course Republicans don't want people stampeding our border and ultimately released onto US soil, with a vague promise to appear later...which is what happened to about 1/3 of those folks.
But you knew that :thumbs
This would be the correct answer to his question.Of course Republicans don't want people stampeding our border and ultimately released onto US soil, with a vague promise to appear later...which is what happened to about 1/3 of those folks.
But you knew that :thumbs
On their way.
On their way.
Maybe we should just say “it’s been a disaster and will continue to be a disaster for Biden” and just end the thread. Guy’s a buffoon and always has been on foreign policy. Really being exposed now
That’s quite the dipsy do there. I think most people want continued immigration. And the smart ones want to seal up the border at the same time. You see, it’s actually possible to do both things at the same time. It’s not an either or proposition.Lack of immigration is hurting the economy. But yeah let's seal up the borders