Who should our next HC be?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Huskerfollower4life said:
It will always need both. Bc you can coach all day long but if you dont have enough talent then you can only get so far. You would think with all the hype that Kansas got with winning and being ranked that the recruiting class would be better then what it is.
Click to expand...


You might expect that.  It doesn't mean that it's realistic, as @ColoradoHusk pointed out.

Huskerfollower4life said:
That just tells me 2 things that recruits may not care about Kansas football or Kansas doesn't necessarily believe in getting better recruits and we will coach them up. 
Click to expand...


I'll take false dichotomies for $1000, Alex.

 
Huskerfollower4life said:
No I call bs. They gained the hype when they got to be 4-0 and then playing Iowa State and then playing TCU. If I remember correctly they were ranked when they versed Iowa State. 
Click to expand...
Even if it was 3 weeks ago, coaches start developing relationships with recruits months ago. It’s unrealistic to for Leipold and his staff to say to top recruits “look out for us, we are gonna be pretty good this year” when those recruits haven’t seen it and Kansas football has no “brand name” to fall back on. 

 
Huskerfollower4life said:
https://m.kusports.com/news/2022/oct/15/matt-tait-ku-football-regression-continues-week-7-/
Click to expand...
Yes, Kansas is coming back to earth, that doesn’t mean that Leipold isn’t a good coach who can still do good things at Kansas.  He’s being competitive against conference teams, with now his backup QB (they were still underdogs against OU).  I think he will want to stick it out there for a while, especially if they give him a raise and contract extension. 

 
ColoradoHusk said:
Even if it was 3 weeks ago, coaches start developing relationships with recruits months ago. It’s unrealistic to for Leipold and his staff to say to top recruits “look out for us, we are gonna be pretty good this year” when those recruits haven’t seen it and Kansas football has no “brand name” to fall back on. 
Click to expand...
I understand your point but the coach can point to his success as a coach in order to get better results. Hey I need you as a football player on my team, this team may not be the best on paper but look at my results as a coach. 

 
ColoradoHusk said:
Yes, Kansas is coming back to earth, that doesn’t mean that Leipold isn’t a good coach who can still do good things at Kansas.  He’s being competitive against conference teams, with now his backup QB (they were still underdogs against OU).  I think he will want to stick it out there for a while, especially if they give him a raise and contract extension. 
Click to expand...
I never said Leipold wasn't a good coach I just don't think he is a good enough coach for Nebraska even if we have a worst record right now then them.  Kansas was smart to hire him bc even a former national championship coach couldn't bring enough talent in to win on a year to year basis.

 
Huskerfollower4life said:
I never said Leipold wasn't a good coach I just don't think he is a good enough coach for Nebraska even if we have a worst record right now then them.  Kansas was smart to hire him bc even a former national championship coach couldn't bring enough talent in to win on a year to year basis.
Click to expand...
I just think the whole idea of a solid coach “not being good enough for Nebraska” is lame because Nebraska has sucked the past 8 years. We haven’t even been average. We have totally sucked. Maybe let’s just try being a good program for a few years.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top