Great points. I remember several times that Chance was used as a lead blocker. I complain about lack of talent quite a bit. When I step back, it's hard to judge them with little to no actual coaching going on. Although they fail miserable to the "eye test". Especially the OL. Hoping a new HC could make them serviceable or better until they can get their guys in.
It really hurt us not to have another multiple threat TE to run more 12 personnel. Really would like to see the new coach get/develop the TE room. Have not heard a thing on Fidone? Staying, going, healthy, no idea. I would also really like to see more commitment to 21 personnel. I think our RB room could be really good. As mentioned earlier, an extra blocker would help until our OL improves. I'd also like a more dedicated QB run game. At least enough designed runs to make the DC account for that. Make the D account for every potential threat on the O. As for coaches Klieman and even Liepold run good systems. It pains me to think we would get KU's coach because they are now playing much better than NU. I like Chadwell. If we can't get that "home run" guy. And I know Chadwell is on no ones board, but a few of us, I'd honestly like to see Klieman. Term gets way over used, but I think he is a scrappy blue collar coach. Just rise and grind. Nothing fancy. Just outworks you. Would definitely have to rely on his ability to develop as I do not think the recruit meter would move much with him. So until he started winning, we'd be dancing with the folks we brought. But who knows who would be on his staff...
End of the day, I just want to win next year. It's all a cyclical argument, but coaching gets wins, winning gets players, players get wins etc....But a new HC is the next, first, best place to start.