Even in the bible... Because I'm pretty sure that's where someone is deriving their moral authority from.You might be on to something here if morality and truth and right and wrong haven't been swaying, moving, changing and progressing throughout the entirety of human history.
But they have, so..
Even in the bible... Because I'm pretty sure that's where someone is deriving their moral authority from.
I’m curious. Where do you derive your moral code from?Even in the bible... Because I'm pretty sure that's where someone is deriving their moral authority from.
If you were do give one position statement of the Christian faith, what would it be?It was moral for Adam & Eve and their closest kin to procreate to make more humans. Today that would be considered an ugly sin but back then? Totally moral.
I’m curious. Where do you derive your moral code from?
You may perceive truth has changed. I believe we covered this earlier. You mentioned things happening in the past as relevant or pervasive meaning they were also representative of truth. I replied that, though they happened or were accepted then, that did not mean it represented what was true.Where do you draw yours from that allows you to feel comfortable claiming that morality and truth don't change when the one thing they have done the entire history of humankind is continue to change.
it's amazingly simple and consistent:I’m curious. Where do you derive your moral code from?
What is your comfort level where others derive their code from alternative places?
Lastly, where do you find safety and solace where these codes imminently collide?
I like it. Do you feel you do this well in practice? What is your key, if yes, or hang up, if no?it's amazingly simple and consistent:
"do unto others as you would have them do unto you""
try it!
You may perceive truth has changed. I believe we covered this earlier. You mentioned things happening in the past as relevant or pervasive meaning they were also representative of truth. I replied that, though they happened or were accepted then, that did not mean it represented what was true.
Curious to what your baseline for truth is as well?
Please take these questions as genuine as I’m in soak-in mode.Why do you keep asking everyone else when you're unwilling to answer for yourself? My baseline for truth is rooted in god and the cosmic Christ, but is a boots-on-the-ground best guess glimpse at best. I'm just one human following in a long line of humans going through new iterations and updates over millenia trying to inch closer and closer to that which is unknowable. I see truth as a beautiful gem, that is real, but every time you turn it and look at it a different way it reveals things that are new and different, it obstructs things you saw before, and is forever re-shaping our vision in unexpected ways.
Yes, I perceive truth has changed. Because it has. But even if it hasn't, I am nothing more than my perception, and we are nothing more than our perception, so the functional difference between the truth and our perception of the truth is non-existent. You can wax poetic about how The Truth Is Out There, but if there are things that the absolute best of our kind held true for thousands of years that ended up not being true, well, it doesn't really do a lot of practical good clutching to that pearl so tightly does it? Other than give you and I some fleeting comfort.
Where I derive my morals from hardly seems relevant to you touting your moral superiority. It would seem that you are the one who needs to disclose your source so we can finally understand where you're coming from.I’m curious. Where do you derive your moral code from?
What is your comfort level where others derive their code from alternative places?
Lastly, where do you find safety and solace where these codes imminently collide?