Red Five
New member
The argument could be made that Satt was too pass happy, but a lot of “experts” thought the best way to attack Michigan State was passing. The trouble with that is NU isn’t good enough passing to take advantage of that.
Agree. MSU's pass defense was statistically their weakness.
But as you state, HH isn't a good enough passer to take advantage of that (and our OL might not be up to handling it either). Calling that many 1st down passes with HH is just asking for trouble IMO. We're just setting ourselves up to be behind the sticks.
NU did come out running the ball well in the 2nd half, but stopped itself after Bullock dropped a pass which would have gained an important first down. MSU then went ahead by three the next drive, and NU struggled to move the ball in the 3rd quarter and early 4th, especially running the ball.
In the 3Q, we just didn't run that many plays - 10 total. We did rip off back to back 11 yard runs on the 1st possession, but ended up punting off the Bullock drop. Then back to back to back 3 and outs ending the 3Q and beginning the 4Q - 6 passes (3 sacks, 1 completion) / 3 rushes.
Last edited by a moderator: