BigRedBuster
Active member
[No message]
Orrrrr...
Legal in all cases, doesn't mean they believe it should be used in all cases. I can see people thinking it should be legal for the Dr and patient to analyze the situation and make the decision themselves. I would think that way fewer than 29% are perfectly comfortable and OK with a woman and Dr aborting a perfectly healthy child a week before birth just because. But....the procedure should be a legal option for very rare situations where it's needed and the baby becomes non-viable, threatening the mom's health/life.It’s pretty sick that 29% of Americans believe abortion should be legal in all cases. Believing it’s ok on Aborting a viable baby a day before natural birth, a month before natural birth, etc. is pretty gross.
Please take your logic elsewhere.Legal in all cases, doesn't mean they believe it should be used in all cases. I can see people thinking it should be legal for the Dr and patient to analyze the situation and make the decision themselves. I would think that way fewer than 29% are perfectly comfortable and OK with a woman and Dr aborting a perfectly healthy child a week before birth just because. But....the procedure should be a legal option for very rare situations where it's needed and the baby becomes non-viable, threatening the mom's health/life.
This got me thinking. Back in the day (1980s) when I was active in peaceful abortion clinic protests, the leaders always pointed to the 'fact' that Margarette Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, started the organization to limit the births of minority women - thus most clinics were in locations where most minorities lived - all for the purposed of promoting the white population at the expense of the minorities - or so I was told. Now 100 years after Sanger's work started to become known we have the same thing happening (if the before mentioned was really true) but in a different way. As noted in your post of Ron F's tweets, Charlie Kirk's statements are a not so vailed racism that says the white majority must be maintained at all costs. Well, any suppression of any culture is a lost for all of us. One thing I've learned in working in international business is that all cultures, all ethnic backgrounds and races only ADD to the human experience and enriches us all. While Sanger saw the value of birth control science in preventing birth defects (her original goal in her work), her association with the eugenics movement did hurt her reputation even though she disagreed with the racial and class focus of the movement. The movement's ideas would become a part of Hitler's White Supremacy policies. But Sanger should not have this tied around her as so painted by leaders in the prolife movement. Would not the Charlie Kirks of this day be more in line with the 'white supremacy' policies of Nazism? I think so.This was always the intent behind the repeal of Roe.
Christo-fascists are worried Whites are going to become a minority in America. Forgetting that America for Whites was never the idea behind this country.
Back in the day (1980s) when I was active in peaceful abortion clinic protests, the leaders always pointed to the 'fact' that Margarette Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, started the organization to limit the births of minority women - thus most clinics were in locations where most minorities lived - all for the purposed of promoting the white population at the expense of the minorities - or so I was told.
It’s pretty sick that 29% of Americans believe abortion should be legal in all cases. Believing it’s ok on Aborting a viable baby a day before natural birth, a month before natural birth, etc. is pretty gross.
It’s pretty sick that 29% of Americans believe abortion should be legal in all cases. Believing it’s ok on Aborting a viable baby a day before natural birth, a month before natural birth, etc. is pretty gross.