Should we fire Satterfield??

Let's wait until we know the freshman quarterback has enough stamina to play the whole game in 95 degree heat before we start firing coaches. I didn't even know WE could fire the coach???
I'm debating the type of run plays called. I remember when Devine Ozigbo was sitting on the bench watching the starter continually run into the lineman's a$$ and hearing that the problem was the play calling and blocking, but I'm pretty sure when he got put in it was similar blocking and play calling. Hmmmm??? I wonder about that kind of stuff a lot. I still prefer the Osborne/Solich running games...but we have to let that go and stop sounding like a grandpa trying to relive the olden days.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In hindsight, had that OC been me, in the late 3rd or 4th quarter up 14-0 I would have put in Harby and continued running the ball, explainng later that Raiola looked like he might have a heatstroke and our running game was doing okay. I wondered why Rutgers stopped running the only guy who was doing anything for them and think it probably had to do with the heat as well. We had an advantage there having 4 RB's who could start for most teams able to seamlessly swap out, plus three or four receivers who could also double as runners, then add Harby who is like a pretty fast freight train. That's the way I would've played it. Run the clock....maybe score again.

 
Hayseed said:
In hindsight, had that OC been me, in the late 3rd or 4th quarter up 14-0 I would have put in Harby and continued running the ball, explainng later that Raiola looked like he might have a heatstroke and our running game was doing okay. I wondered why Rutgers stopped running the only guy who was doing anything for them and think it probably had to do with the heat as well. We had an advantage there having 4 RB's who could start for most teams able to seamlessly swap out, plus three or four receivers who could also double as runners, then add Harby who is like a pretty fast freight train. That's the way I would've played it. Run the clock....maybe score again.
Click to expand...
You would have put in the backup QB in a tight game. The same QB that had turnover issues last year. 

These takes are idiotic.

 
Rhule certainly isn’t going to fire Satt mid season when the team is 5-1.  That’s ridiculous.  However if the offense continues to struggle for entire halves going forward, then Rhule wouldn’t be out of bounds for encouraging Satt to move on and get a more competent OC 

 
RedDenver said:
You would have put in the backup QB in a tight game. The same QB that had turnover issues last year. 

These takes are idiotic.
Click to expand...
Can you imagine the meltdown if Rhule put in Haarberg and pulls the guy everyone up to this point had agreed is a generational talent, he turns it over, and we lose?  Great way for a coach to get fired and even better way to insure said generational talent heads to the portal.   

 
Scarlet said:
Can you imagine the meltdown if Rhule put in Haarberg and pulls the guy everyone up to this point had agreed is a generational talent, he turns it over, and we lose?  Great way for a coach to get fired and even better way to insure said generational talent heads to the portal.   
Click to expand...
Thats true. The defense saved the game but there would definitely be an uproar from a bunch of fans. I hope the local media reads these boards and tempers their comments to the coaching staff accordingly .

 
It's tough to have an effective offense when your QB is completing less than 50% of his passes, not taking the open options and taking sacks he doesn't need to.

I like the idea on these plays but he throws off his back foot and doesn't get enough on it (again).


 
Back
Top