The Democrat Utopia

Dude, I’m not the one saying it. A lot of people in our government are saying including some republicans. 
 

If she’s not a Russian agent, then she’s a big Russian sympathizer because she echos everything Putin says and supports everything he wants. 
 

So, asset, sympathizer…..you can choose. Both prove she’s a piece of s#!t that should not be in the position she’s going to be in. 
It would be like putting one of #teachercd s “pally bros” as an Ambassador to Israel….

 
Dude, I’m not the one saying it. A lot of people in our government are saying including some republicans. 
 

If she’s not a Russian agent, then she’s a big Russian sympathizer because she echos everything Putin says and supports everything he wants. 
 

So, asset, sympathizer…..you can choose. Both prove she’s a piece of s#!t that should not be in the position she’s going to be in. 
Why hasn't she been arrested or sent back to Russia then? 

Not to mention she needs to pass a major back ground check to get that position.

That said, I would chose someone with actual experience for this position, not a crony.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why hasn't she been arrested or sent back to Russia then? 
If anyone truly thinks she is actually a Russian spy, they are delusional and your opinion of them is spot on.

But like Trump, she’s a useful idiot.  It’s not illegal, but it’s sad that a person that high up in our govt can fall for Russian talking points so easily and somehow view Putin an a misunderstood leader who only wants what’s best for all of Europe and the western world.

 
If anyone truly thinks she is actually a Russian spy, they are delusional and your opinion of them is spot on.

But like Trump, she’s a useful idiot.  It’s not illegal, but it’s sad that a person that high up in our govt can fall for Russian talking points so easily and somehow view Putin an a misunderstood leader who only wants what’s best for all of Europe and the western world.
Useful idiot could be true.

 
Some conservatives told me once they thought the 2020 election was stolen. I told them if they believe that, prove it. 

If she is a Russian asset prove it. Shouldn't be that hard. Dems have cried wolf too many times. 
Kind of hard when they aren’t going to do a back ground check on her. 
 

Question, why wouldn’t they?

Im fine settling on useful idiot. Same result. 

 
Kind of hard when they aren’t going to do a back ground check on her. 
 

Question, why wouldn’t they?

Im fine settling on useful idiot. Same result. 
They are not going to let anyone near classified info without a clearance. The higher the clearance, the more thorough the background check. They will interview her childhood neighbors. They are going to know if you are a risk. I have people at work start to act disgruntled and get labeled an insider threat. If she was near classified info as a congress women, she has already been vetted. 

Although Swalwell was banging a Chinese spy and I guess they still let him near intelligence info. That was head scratcher.

 
They are not going to let anyone near classified info without a clearance. The higher the clearance, the more thorough the background check. They will interview her childhood neighbors. They are going to know if you are a risk. I have people at work start to act disgruntled and get labeled an insider threat. If she was near classified info as a congress women, she has already been vetted. 

Although Swalwell was banging a Chinese spy and I guess they still let him near intelligence info. That was head scratcher.
Yeah…..and his daughter and son in law were handling secret info in his prior admin without clearance. 

 
They are not going to let anyone near classified info without a clearance. The higher the clearance, the more thorough the background check. They will interview her childhood neighbors. They are going to know if you are a risk. I have people at work start to act disgruntled and get labeled an insider threat. If she was near classified info as a congress women, she has already been vetted. 

Although Swalwell was banging a Chinese spy and I guess they still let him near intelligence info. That was head scratcher.
Buddy I got some bad news for you. You know who gets the final word on security clearances? The President. Just like he can unilaterally decide to declassify stuff on his own. They’ll go through (or not go through) whatever level of scrutiny and background checks he wants. It’s his government and he’s appointing all his dips#!t buddies to run every important position.

There’s no serious objective layer of government that’s going to stop a dictatorial bootlicker like Tulsi from accessing our nation’s most sensitive secrets. If Donald Trump wants her to, she will. No one will stop him.

Doesn’t mean she should. She’s proven herself a bootlicker and a water carrier for terrible, autocratic enemies of America time and time again. But Donald Trump doesn’t care so here we are.

 
I’m really amused by all the Trump supporters that now act as if the normal governmental guardrails will keep his wildest plans and appointments in check, even as Trump Government Wreckers Inc. is just beginning. The complete lack of recognizing the consequences of what they voted for is simply amazing.

If he doesn’t want someone vetted, they won’t be. If they are vetted and found lacking, they’ll be put in place anyway. And that inflation that got y’all so worked up to throw out the dems….well, you ain’t seen nuthin yet. But hey, thanks for f#&%ing this country for the foreseeable future. You really showed those libs. Let’s see how that works out for ya.

 
Let’s see how that works out for ya.
That's all we can do.  Trump won and now has both chambers of congress.  So....let it play out.  There is nothing any of us can do about it.  Either it's going to be ushering in a glorious time in America.  Or....it's going to be s#!tshow.  

Again...nothing we can do about it.  So, just grab a beer and sit back and watch.

 
Back
Top