Biden Foreign Policy

Archy1221 said:
But you are the one gnashing your teeth trying to equate one foreign conflict into Biden’s entire foreign policy.  No one else is.  
 

His foreign policy has been terrible as it has been for decades.  He is kinda just President INO now (I guess that’s been the case for awhile) so yeah, my post fits.  👍
Click to expand...
No nashing at all.

 
Archy1221 said:
No need to continue gnashing teeth.  I just pointed out a factual statement.   
 

Was that invasion you pointed to occur anytime in 2017-Jan 2021??   Just wondering 
Click to expand...
Putin's going to do Putin things.  I'm not the one nashing.  I'm fine with how he's handled it.

Typical, you come in here and post you just think everything is horrible and 'ol Joe is doing such a horrible job.  I post....naaa...he's really not.  You then post.....Ahhhhh....your nashing teeth.  

No....that's not what's happening.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ratt Mhule said:
There is a reason why hearsay isnt allowed in a court of law. 
Click to expand...
Yep and I could be wrong but it didn’t look like Court!    And being on record is sooooooooo much better than the “anonymous” sources quite often cited as proof now a days in our media and taken as fact by people on this board. 

 
Scarlet said:
Trying to see where Jake Sullivan blamed Russia's aggression towards a sovereign neighbor on the US.  It couldn't be that MAGA is misrepresenting the facts again in favor of Russia could it?  
Click to expand...
Who knew Jake Sullivan was MAGA and misrepresenting facts?   Didn’t have that on my bingo card.  
 

Oh wait, you mean you think Jeffrey Sachs is “MAGA”?????   Oh gotcha.  Probably news to him.  :laughpound :laughpound :laughpound :laughpound
 

https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/jeffrey-sachs-on-the-catastrophic-american-response-to-the-coronavirus

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Sachs

 
Archy1221 said:
Who knew Jake Sullivan was “MAGA”  :snacks:    Strange times we live in now I guess.  Very very strange times.  
Click to expand...


Archy1221 said:
Yep and I could be wrong but it didn’t look like Court!    And being on record is sooooooooo much better than the “anonymous” sources quite often cited as proof now a days in our media and taken as fact by people on this board. 
Click to expand...


Archy1221 said:
Who knew Jake Sullivan was MAGA and misrepresenting facts?   Didn’t have that on my bingo card.  
 

Oh wait, you mean you think Jeffrey Sachs is “MAGA”?????   Oh gotcha.  Probably news to him.  :laughpound :laughpound :laughpound :laughpound
 

https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/jeffrey-sachs-on-the-catastrophic-american-response-to-the-coronavirus

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Sachs
Click to expand...
Again, obfuscating the actual issue by fixating on some unimportant tangent.

Trump is doing Putin’s bidding.

Trump is hanging Ukraine out to dry.

Trump is lying about the Russian invasion and aggression that started and has continued the war.

MAGAdom seems to be just fine with these things.

Would you care to comment on these serious issues, or will you be deflecting to yet another ancillary issue that doesn’t have jack s#!t to do with anything?

 




I know you refused to vote for Donald Trump a third time, nor do you feel obliged to carry his water, so are you leaning in to the belief that Vladimir Putin was not the aggressor, and Ukraine, NATO, and American Democrats are at fault for Russia's invasion?  Not out to loyalty to Trump of course, but because of the clear evidence you demand before forging your opinion? 

 
JJ Husker said:
Again, obfuscating the actual issue by fixating on some unimportant tangent.

Trump is doing Putin’s bidding.

Trump is hanging Ukraine out to dry.

Trump is lying about the Russian invasion and aggression that started and has continued the war.

MAGAdom seems to be just fine with these things.

Would you care to comment on these serious issues, or will you be deflecting to yet another ancillary issue that doesn’t have jack s#!t to do with anything?
Click to expand...
Well, I know your agenda doesn’t allow for it, but those were posts in response to a poster claiming the man on video was some Trump loving “MAGA” dude.   You know, doing the obfuscating you seem to just greatly despise 😃

So now getting to the meat and potatoes of the actual video that you didn’t watch, one of the hang ups with this war as I understand it is Ukraine and NATO membership.   MOST people without an agenda like yours would agree that Jake Sullivan (I hope you know who that is) admitting Ukraine will not get into NATO, according to man on video so take it for what’s it worth, but refusing to say it publicly may be a big deal worthy of discussion.    
 

Instead, you get caught up in some other poster trying to make this a “MAGA” thingy instead of the substance.  You know, obfuscating!   
 

Putin should not have invaded.

Putin is the aggressor

Putin is a piece of s#!t

Russia is a s#!tty a$$ country that deserves a beat down. 

EU/Biden should have kept Nordstream2 sanctions 
Ukraine is a corrupt country but didn’t deserve to be attacked 

In a perfect world, Ukraine should get their territory back, war should stop, and Russia should have world wide sanctions for starting it.   But we all know that is probably never going to happen. I mean, Crimea during Obama is another example.  
 

Hopefully that sums it up for you.  Now your thoughts on the video posted.   Your thoughts on a realistic outcome for ending the war.   Your thoughts on Sec of State Rubio’s conversation with Zelensky on partnering on mineral rights?   Or should we just continue to obfuscate on posts showing pushback to another posters ridiculous claims?   Either way, I’m fine with it.  You can decide. 

 
Back
Top