zoogs
New member
Not going to bring Watson into this at all as I think either way he is not going to remain. Completely moot point.
Why can't I say, he could be a competent OC in a few years? The guy has to start being an OC for one thing, or else he is just the same as any large number of up-and-comer position coaches looking to rise up the ranks. Scott Frost has won zero national titles as an offensive coordinator. I can't believe we are still using the player success = coaching success argument like it has any merit. I also don't know how anyone can possibly compare Scott's resume with Bo in 2003. It isn't even close.
Scott has been an offensive positions coach for all of two years.
I also don't know why it is acceptable for a guy to come in and learn on the fly about running an offense, when we could bring in someone who already has shown - at a lower level, or whatever - that they can. It's why names like Morris from Tulsa have some enthused. Probably won't happen though. And people will give Frost more benefit of the doubt - or, mind-numbingly, say "Frost is not as good, but I would prefer him anyway". Sure, maybe ever single one of Chip Kelley's assistants are just that proficient at running his offense and are all going to be chased after for coordinator jobs soon. Or maybe not. Maybe we should look at some young offensive assistant coaches from Wisconsin or Oklahoma or Auburn or Alabama or Nevada or...well, none of them are Husker alums, so you get the idea.
Scott is probably an enthusiastic, young, up-and-coming, good coach, who as I said, has the potential to keep rising up those ranks, which is something that is very difficult to do, and few succeed at it. So good for him. But we are talking about people already looking at his potential arrival as a potential eventual Bo replacement. If you ask me, that is completely nuts. That's an off the wall projection you simply can't make, unless you want to say any number of assistants are probable candidates for major BCS head coaching jobs in a few years. The only thing Scott has going for him in these arguments is that he's a Nebraska guy.
Lastly, I'm not sure the extent to which this is true, but if Bo really does not see eye to eye with Frost, then I would not be in favor of Osborne pulling rank and forcing a co-OC on Bo that he's not going to hit it off with, under any circumstance. In summary: if Frost comes here as a co-OC, good for him, and it means we eschewed going after a big time OC to revamp the offense, and it does not mean he is any threat to Bo with an 'HC in waiting' dynamic. Hope the gamble works out. Hope things have changed between him and Bo.
Why can't I say, he could be a competent OC in a few years? The guy has to start being an OC for one thing, or else he is just the same as any large number of up-and-comer position coaches looking to rise up the ranks. Scott Frost has won zero national titles as an offensive coordinator. I can't believe we are still using the player success = coaching success argument like it has any merit. I also don't know how anyone can possibly compare Scott's resume with Bo in 2003. It isn't even close.
Scott has been an offensive positions coach for all of two years.
I also don't know why it is acceptable for a guy to come in and learn on the fly about running an offense, when we could bring in someone who already has shown - at a lower level, or whatever - that they can. It's why names like Morris from Tulsa have some enthused. Probably won't happen though. And people will give Frost more benefit of the doubt - or, mind-numbingly, say "Frost is not as good, but I would prefer him anyway". Sure, maybe ever single one of Chip Kelley's assistants are just that proficient at running his offense and are all going to be chased after for coordinator jobs soon. Or maybe not. Maybe we should look at some young offensive assistant coaches from Wisconsin or Oklahoma or Auburn or Alabama or Nevada or...well, none of them are Husker alums, so you get the idea.
Scott is probably an enthusiastic, young, up-and-coming, good coach, who as I said, has the potential to keep rising up those ranks, which is something that is very difficult to do, and few succeed at it. So good for him. But we are talking about people already looking at his potential arrival as a potential eventual Bo replacement. If you ask me, that is completely nuts. That's an off the wall projection you simply can't make, unless you want to say any number of assistants are probable candidates for major BCS head coaching jobs in a few years. The only thing Scott has going for him in these arguments is that he's a Nebraska guy.
Lastly, I'm not sure the extent to which this is true, but if Bo really does not see eye to eye with Frost, then I would not be in favor of Osborne pulling rank and forcing a co-OC on Bo that he's not going to hit it off with, under any circumstance. In summary: if Frost comes here as a co-OC, good for him, and it means we eschewed going after a big time OC to revamp the offense, and it does not mean he is any threat to Bo with an 'HC in waiting' dynamic. Hope the gamble works out. Hope things have changed between him and Bo.
Last edited by a moderator: