Bad. If it would have been called incomplete on the field that would be different but I really don't think the replay shows indisputable evidence that the call should have been overturned.
I thought it was a terrible call. He took about 3 steps, not forward, but sideways and twisting trying to avoid the tackle and had control of the football. The DB did a great job knocking the ball lose. If the receiver had stepped out of bounds after the 3rd step inbounds would they have ruled it incomplete? I doubt it.
@swmohusker could have but it ended up not mattering so I'm not sure how you can say that was a worse call. I think the call that completely changed the scoreboard and momentum is probably worse than one that ended up not mattering.
Bad call. No way the call on the field should've been overturned. Likewise, if it had been called incomplete on the field, that also would've been tough to overturn (but easier than what they did overturn). It's possible he never had clean possession but the replays didn't prove that. Unless they had some views we weren't shown, that was a terrible game changing review. It's almost like Dean Blandino had the call :lol:
@swmohusker that was 100% on Olave. If he runs the route he was supposed to there is no interception. So yea, pretty terrible call by Olave there to break off his route I'll give you that
Yep. Looks like they were running the same concept/matchup they scored on 4th and 1 earlier in the game. Olave looks like he is running the post then breaks to the corner.
Bad call. Ball dropps straight to the ground after the rake because he had possession of the ball. No control you would expect the ball to still had energy from the failed control and roll or spin from his hands after it comes loose. Wouldn't overturn the call either way and should have stayed a scoop and score.