2004 & 2005 Comparisons

R

Roy CO HSKR

New member
From sonofahusker:

Turn arounds from 2004 to 2005:

Texas Tech

2004: 10-70, 2005: 31-34

+57 points

Kansas State

2004: 21-45, 2005: 27-25

+26 points

Colorado

2004: 20-26, 2005 30-3

+21 points

Oklahoma

2004: 3-30, 2005: 24-31

+20 points

In '05, we lost to Kansas 40-15. I'm going on record by stating that we'll beat Kansas in '06 by 33+ points, and exceed our 57 point turn around vs. Tech.

Nebraska 42

Kansas 7

Man, that's going to feel good!

__________________

From rojo:

KU for 2006:

Offense:

--6 starters return.

--No returning QB

Defense: Their strong suit last fall. But...

--3 starters return.

Things look to be a bit thin for Mangino....

 
That should prove to the people that we are improving greatly, if our overall record wasn't enough to indicate that.

It looks like the cupboards are pretty bare at KU. It could be a pretty bad spanking for them.......REVENGE :thumbs

 
Yup good stats. Though man I really want to close my eyes and forget all about KU this year and pretend it was all a dream.

It does make me feel uneasy that we even have to TALK about beating KU, it should be assumed... and I'm gonna attribute this time to the stars lined up wrong or something.

 
I wish people would realize that they lost all 3 starting linebackers on defense, not to mention the Big 12 Defensive POTY. Nick Reid, Kevin Kane and Banks Floodman were the heart and soul of that defense, and they're all gone. You don't just reload a great defense when you lose guys like that.

 
From sonofahusker:
Turn arounds from 2004 to 2005:

Texas Tech

2004: 10-70, 2005: 31-34

+57 points

Kansas State

2004: 21-45, 2005: 27-25

+26 points

Colorado

2004: 20-26, 2005 30-3

+21 points

Oklahoma

2004: 3-30, 2005: 24-31

+20 points

In '05, we lost to Kansas 40-15. I'm going on record by stating that we'll beat Kansas in '06 by 33+ points, and exceed our 57 point turn around vs. Tech.

Nebraska 42

Kansas 7

Man, that's going to feel good!

__________________

From rojo:

KU for 2006:

Offense:

--6 starters return.

--No returning QB

Defense: Their strong suit last fall. But...

--3 starters return.

Things look to be a bit thin for Mangino....
Click to expand...
Flag!!! 15 yard penalty!

You cannot use "thin" and "Mark Mangino" in the same sentence!!!!!!!!!

 
Things look to be a bit thin for Mangino....

Right, Mangino and thin.....

Next you'll tell me that things will look thin for nepolo7 as well

 
F you guys I got to wear a tux this summer. I should be down to like a 43 inch waist by then.

I will have vertical stripes as well

I am going to go back to my beer and cheese curds they never call me fat or make me cry

 
From sonofahusker:
Turn arounds from 2004 to 2005:

Texas Tech

2004: 10-70, 2005: 31-34

+57 points

Kansas State

2004: 21-45, 2005: 27-25

+26 points

Colorado

2004: 20-26, 2005 30-3

+21 points

Oklahoma

2004: 3-30, 2005: 24-31

+20 points

In '05, we lost to Kansas 40-15. I'm going on record by stating that we'll beat Kansas in '06 by 33+ points, and exceed our 57 point turn around vs. Tech.

Nebraska 42

Kansas 7

Man, that's going to feel good!

__________________

From rojo:

KU for 2006:

Offense:

--6 starters return.

--No returning QB

Defense: Their strong suit last fall. But...

--3 starters return.

Things look to be a bit thin for Mangino....
Click to expand...
You appear to be missing a team. ;)

2002 ISU 36 NU 14- Ames

2003 NU 28- ISU 0 Lincoln

2004 ISU 34- NU 27- Ames

2005 NU 27- ISU 20 Lincoln 2 OT's

Looks like ISU is closing the gap, even in Lincoln. :)

 
From sonofahusker:
Turn arounds from 2004 to 2005:

Texas Tech

2004: 10-70, 2005: 31-34

+57 points

Kansas State

2004: 21-45, 2005: 27-25

+26 points

Colorado

2004: 20-26, 2005 30-3

+21 points

Oklahoma

2004: 3-30, 2005: 24-31

+20 points

In '05, we lost to Kansas 40-15. I'm going on record by stating that we'll beat Kansas in '06 by 33+ points, and exceed our 57 point turn around vs. Tech.

Nebraska 42

Kansas 7

Man, that's going to feel good!

__________________

From rojo:

KU for 2006:

Offense:

--6 starters return.

--No returning QB

Defense: Their strong suit last fall. But...

--3 starters return.

Things look to be a bit thin for Mangino....
Click to expand...
You appear to be missing a team. ;)

2002 ISU 36 NU 14- Ames

2003 NU 28- ISU 0 Lincoln

2004 ISU 34- NU 27- Ames

2005 NU 27- ISU 20 Lincoln 2 OT's

Looks like ISU is closing the gap, even in Lincoln. :)
Click to expand...
dedhoarse

 
pigsonthewing: Thanks for the note on the ISU comparison. That would be a swing of +14 from 2004-2005.

Who is going to be the toughest opponent in the Big 12 North? I suppose that would be primarily based on returning starters and a QB with some experience.

 
Back
Top