2017 Returning Production

BIG ERN

New member
 




Team


OFF % RET


Rk


Proj. PPG change (Off)


DEF % RET


Rk


Proj. PPG change (Def)


% RET


Rk


FIU


85%


14


2.9


85%


6


-3.6


85%


1


TCU


92%


5


3.3


77%


23


-2.2


85%


2


Oregon


76%


37


2.3


91%


3


-4.6


84%


3


FAU


91%


8


3.3


76%


27


-2.1


83%


4


Wake Forest


97%


1


3.4


69%


49


-0.9


83%


5


Texas


84%


15


2.9


80%


12


-2.8


82%


6


Kentucky


87%


12


3.1


76%


25


-2.1


81%


7


S. Carolina


91%


7


3.3


72%


44


-1.3


81%


8


Georgia


77%


35


2.4


85%


5


-3.6


81%


9


Vanderbilt


94%


3


3.4


68%


59


-0.6


81%


10


Tulane


81%


20


2.7


80%


14


-2.7


80%


11


EMU


92%


6


3.3


69%


52


-0.8


80%


12


Indiana


63%


67


0.8


96%


1


-5.4


79%


13


Colorado St.


84%


16


2.9


74%


34


-1.7


79%


14


UMass


74%


41


2.1


84%


7


-3.4


79%


15


Miami (OH)


82%


18


2.8


75%


31


-2


79%


16


Syracuse


64%


64


1


93%


2


-5


79%


17


UTSA


81%


19


2.7


74%


33


-1.8


78%


18


SMU


94%


2


3.4


59%


81


0.9


77%


19


App. St.


80%


23


2.7


72%


43


-1.3


76%


20


Iowa St.


86%


13


3.1


65%


66


0


75%


21


Stanford


76%


38


2.3


74%


36


-1.7


75%


22


Arizona


70%


47


1.7


79%


16


-2.6


75%


23


Troy


93%


4


3.4


56%


98


1.6


74%


24


Virginia


64%


62


1


84%


8


-3.4


74%


25


USF


71%


46


1.8


77%


21


-2.2


74%


26


Penn St.


79%


26


2.6


68%


55


-0.6


74%


27


ULM


79%


28


2.5


67%


63


-0.5


73%


28


Ga. Tech


62%


70


0.7


82%


10


-3.2


72%


29


Northwestern


67%


55


1.3


77%


22


-2.2


72%


30


Missouri


89%


10


3.2


54%


102


1.9


72%


31


BGSU


74%


42


2.1


69%


53


-0.8


71%


32


Nevada


61%


73


0.5


81%


11


-2.9


71%


33


NC St.


83%


17


2.9


58%


90


1.1


71%


34


Arizona St.


72%


45


1.9


70%


48


-0.9


71%


35


Kansas St.


79%


24


2.6


61%


77


0.6


70%


36


Army


66%


56


1.2


74%


35


-1.7


70%


37


NMSU


57%


87


0


83%


9


-3.2


70%


38


Florida St.


60%


79


0.4


80%


13


-2.8


70%


39


Oregon St.


77%


36


2.3


63%


70


0.2


70%


40


MTSU


81%


22


2.7


59%


83


0.9


70%


41


BC


67%


53


1.4


72%


42


-1.3


69%


42


Wash. St.


67%


54


1.4


72%


41


-1.3


69%


43


Memphis


87%


11


3.1


51%


109


2.5


69%


44


Louisville


58%


84


0.1


80%


15


-2.7


69%


45


Rutgers


60%


76


0.4


76%


29


-2


68%


46


Texas St.


68%


51


1.4


68%


58


-0.6


68%


47


Duke


79%


25


2.6


55%


100


1.6


67%


48


Oklahoma St.


78%


30


2.5


56%


97


1.5


67%


49


Florida


81%


21


2.7


53%


103


2


67%


50


CMU


60%


78


0.4


74%


37


-1.7


67%


51


Wisconsin


66%


58


1.2


68%


56


-0.6


67%


52


Cincinnati


70%


48


1.7


64%


68


0.1


67%


53


Oklahoma


60%


77


0.4


73%


40


-1.6


67%


54


SDSU


79%


27


2.6


53%


104


2


66%


55


Auburn


72%


43


1.9


60%


79


0.8


66%


56


Wyoming


45%


103


-2.1


87%


4


-4


66%


57


Utah St.


76%


39


2.3


56%


94


1.4


66%


58


North Texas


63%


65


0.8


69%


54


-0.8


66%


59


Rice


53%


92


-0.6


78%


19


-2.5


66%


60


UNLV


90%


9


3.2


41%


117


4.2


66%


61


Purdue


55%


89


-0.3


76%


30


-2


66%


62


Miss. St.


72%


44


1.9


59%


85


0.9


65%


63


Ark. St.


78%


29


2.5


50%


111


2.5


64%


64


UTEP


57%


86


0


71%


46


-1.1


64%


65


Georgia St.


65%


59


1.2


62%


72


0.3


64%


66


Marshall


50%


96


-1.1


76%


26


-2.1


63%


67


SJSU


51%


95


-1.1


76%


28


-2.1


63%


68


Ball St.


65%


60


1.1


62%


74


0.4


63%


69


Washington


75%


40


2.2


50%


110


2.5


63%


70


USC


58%


82


0.2


67%


61


-0.6


63%


71


Ohio St.


68%


50


1.5


57%


92


1.3


63%


72


Alabama


64%


61


1


59%


84


0.9


62%


73


Texas Tech


62%


69


0.8


59%


82


0.9


61%


74


Charlotte


63%


66


0.8


59%


86


1


61%


75


So. Miss


61%


72


0.6


60%


80


0.8


61%


76


ODU


51%


94


-1


69%


51


-0.8


60%


77


Hawaii


64%


63


1


56%


99


1.6


60%


78


Buffalo


47%


98


-1.7


71%


45


-1.2


59%


79


Fresno St.


77%


34


2.4


40%


121


4.5


58%


80


Toledo


68%


52


1.4


49%


113


2.8


58%


81


California


38%


111


-3.6


78%


18


-2.5


58%


82


Kansas


78%


31


2.4


38%


122


4.8


58%


83


UCF


78%


32


2.4


38%


123


4.8


58%


84


Maryland


38%


110


-3.5


77%


24


-2.1


57%


85


Notre Dame


58%


83


0.2


56%


96


1.5


57%


86


Temple


58%


85


0.1


56%


95


1.5


57%


87


UConn


60%


75


0.5


53%


105


2


57%


88


Akron


63%


68


0.8


51%


108


2.4


57%


89


Arkansas


55%


91


-0.4


58%


89


1.1


57%


90


Minnesota


45%


102


-2


68%


60


-0.6


57%


91


Va. Tech


34%


119


-4.5


79%


17


-2.5


56%


92


Baylor


45%


104


-2.2


67%


62


-0.5


56%


93


NIU


38%


112


-3.6


74%


39


-1.6


56%


94


Boise St.


60%


74


0.5


50%


112


2.6


55%


95


Houston


51%


93


-0.9


58%


91


1.1


55%


96


UL-Laf.


40%


108


-3.2


69%


50


-0.9


54%


97


Kent St.


62%


71


0.6


47%


114


3.1


54%


98


UCLA


68%


49


1.5


40%


120


4.5


54%


99


WKU


46%


101


-1.9


62%


75


0.4


54%


100


Ohio


41%


107


-3


67%


64


-0.5


54%


101


Colorado


77%


33


2.4


29%


126


6.6


53%


102


Navy


32%


122


-5


74%


38


-1.7


53%


103


S. Alabama


46%


100


-1.9


58%


88


1.1


52%


104


Tulsa


29%


124


-5.6


75%


32


-1.9


52%


105


BYU


34%


118


-4.4


70%


47


-0.9


52%


106


Texas A&M


39%


109


-3.3


64%


67


0


52%


107


Illinois


50%


97


-1.2


53%


106


2


51%


108


Tennessee


42%


106


-2.8


61%


78


0.6


51%


109


Ole Miss


37%


115


-3.8


63%


71


0.2


50%


110


LSU


59%


80


0.3


40%


119


4.4


50%


111


Idaho


56%


88


-0.2


43%


116


3.8


50%


112


ECU


37%


113


-3.7


61%


76


0.5


49%


113


New Mexico


66%


57


1.2


33%


125


5.8


49%


114


Utah


59%


81


0.3


37%


124


4.9


48%


115


Coastal Caro.


55%


90


-0.3


41%


118


4.3


48%


116


Clemson


32%


121


-4.8


62%


73


0.4


47%


117


Iowa


27%


125


-6.2


68%


57


-0.6


47%


118


WMU


15%


129


-9.5


78%


20


-2.4


46%


119


Miami


37%


114


-3.7


55%


101


1.7


46%


120


Ga. Southern


35%


117


-4.2


57%


93


1.3


46%


121


Nebraska


26%


127


-6.3


65%


65


-0.1


46%


122


Pittsburgh


44%


105


-2.3


44%


115


3.7


44%


123


Mich. St.


35%


116


-4.2


52%


107


2.2


44%


124


La. Tech


26%


126


-6.3


59%


87


1


43%


125


N. Carolina


19%


128


-8.4


64%


69


0.1


41%


126


Michigan


46%


99


-1.8


22%


128


7.9


34%


127


WVU


30%


123


-5.3


25%


127


7.2


28%


128


Air Force


33%


120


-4.7


18%


129


8.6


25%


129





(Note: This list does not include FBS newcomer UAB, which is starting from scratch.)


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well and the other thing is the NU has a QB that is a far more competent passer than what they had last year. 

Good thing this sort of thing doesn't matter in games because it would be a long year for NU being that far down the list! 

 
When you graduate your 4 year starter at QB and several of his favorite receivers and the 'starting' RB (although he may not have been significantly better than those behind him), you would expect this sort of statistical result.  But, if you are expecting better production from those you are replacing, then there is plenty of reason for optimism and these numbers will not likely be indicative of the upcoming season results.  

 
I prefer the glass is half full approach.....It's not only 26% production returning but rather 74% lack of production that is not returning.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
When you graduate your 4 year starter at QB and several of his favorite receivers and the 'starting' RB (although he may not have been significantly better than those behind him), you would expect this sort of statistical result.  But, if you are expecting better production from those you are replacing, then there is plenty of reason for optimism and these numbers will not likely be indicative of the upcoming season results.  
I agree to this for the most part. We lost a lot of SRs, but only 1 of them was drafted (last pick 5th round). Tanner Lee and the LB core are the two main keys for this upcoming season. 

 
When you graduate your 4 year starter at QB and several of his favorite receivers and the 'starting' RB (although he may not have been significantly better than those behind him), you would expect this sort of statistical result.  But, if you are expecting better production from those you are replacing, then there is plenty of reason for optimism and these numbers will not likely be indicative of the upcoming season results.  


POLL Question: Do we prefer longer post or short post in BOLD?

 
Back
Top