I haven't watched much of the two guys, but when watching the game on Saturday, Sallis seemed to have a lot of boom/bust characteristics when transitioning to the college level. Sallis is an unbelievable athlete and is super quick. But, he also seemed to sulk at times when he didn't get a call or he missed a makeable shot. I wonder if he will struggle with the physicality of the college game. He should try to go to a school with an offense that likes to push the ball and create quick scores.Chucky's going to be better at the next level than Sallis is.
I haven't watched much of the two guys, but when watching the game on Saturday, Sallis seemed to have a lot of boom/bust characteristics when transitioning to the college level. Sallis is an unbelievable athlete and is super quick. But, he also seemed to sulk at times when he didn't get a call or he missed a makeable shot. I wonder if he will struggle with the physicality of the college game. He should try to go to a school with an offense that likes to push the ball and create quick scores.
I really liked what I saw from Chucky. He looked so solid. He is a good enough athlete, and looked a lot stronger than Sallis. Chucky's defense is what sets him apart from the two players. He created so many turnovers against the other team.
Agree 100% that Gonzaga would be a great fit for Sallis, if he's willing to give it a year or two to be a role player while he gets stronger. It's a wide open offense, in a conference which isn't physical. I know Gonzaga plays a tough non-conference schedule every year, but 2-3 months of physical basketball in the Big Ten, ACC, or Big 12 is much different.Nailed it on Hunter; when he's dialed in, he's every bit the 5 star. He's going to have to get used to not being The Man for the first couple of years of college (and put on some good weight; he needs to bulk up a bit). Even money on Gonzaga, too.