zoogs
New member
Ever since the Riley hire, 74Hunter has been incessant.
I'd like to and did believe it was genuine at first, but then I'm remembering his admitted trolling on Armstrong, another posting campaign of his that he did only because of what he perceived as unjust posts about Martinez in the past.
His stance now is this:
I don't want to limit opinions, but if it's not genuine, it's trolling. However, there are also posters who share some of Hunter's opinions who probably do feel that way.
It's pretty polo-esque. But different. In what seems like a worse way. Polo wanted to rally people to his cause because he thought Bo should be fired, and Bo's job status being a talking point was a natural carryover from 2013 (as tired as the talking was). Hunter (and a few others) want to rally people to their "If they don't win big, fire Eichorst, fire Perlman, fire Riley" cause just because. I'm not sure if we should indulge him in using HB as his platform for this. But also not sure we should do anything.
Anyway, I'm thinking the next time I have to move 70 posts out of one thread on (largely) his behalf, he might get an extended posting break, maybe 30 days. And if he comes back with the same tune, he'll get a longer one...and if he comes back with the same tune after that, maybe a ban. Thoughts?
I'd like to and did believe it was genuine at first, but then I'm remembering his admitted trolling on Armstrong, another posting campaign of his that he did only because of what he perceived as unjust posts about Martinez in the past.
His stance now is this:
...and he's been railing on Riley non-stop in every thread, including the thread for a new recruit offered by the incoming staff.What I'm saying is in the next 2 years anything less than 11 wins per year, a B1G championship, and a spot in the playoffs should call for a coaching, AD, and chancellor change.
I don't want to limit opinions, but if it's not genuine, it's trolling. However, there are also posters who share some of Hunter's opinions who probably do feel that way.
It's pretty polo-esque. But different. In what seems like a worse way. Polo wanted to rally people to his cause because he thought Bo should be fired, and Bo's job status being a talking point was a natural carryover from 2013 (as tired as the talking was). Hunter (and a few others) want to rally people to their "If they don't win big, fire Eichorst, fire Perlman, fire Riley" cause just because. I'm not sure if we should indulge him in using HB as his platform for this. But also not sure we should do anything.
Anyway, I'm thinking the next time I have to move 70 posts out of one thread on (largely) his behalf, he might get an extended posting break, maybe 30 days. And if he comes back with the same tune, he'll get a longer one...and if he comes back with the same tune after that, maybe a ban. Thoughts?
Last edited by a moderator: