AFCA All Americans

[ICT HSKR 10]

Congrats to Prince for making the AFCA All American team! Henery got screwed yet again, the kicker they chose from Duke is 21-24 on field goals & 32-32 on PAT's. In what universe is that better than Henery's 16-17 & 51-51?

link

http://www.afca.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=9300&ATCLID=205038263

 

[melscott62]

who did they have ahead of crick?

 

[BIGREDFAN_in_OMAHA]

who did they have ahead of crick?

Looks like Adrian Clayborn of Iowa and Jabaal Sheard of Pitt

 

[holvy83]

Crick didn't play up to the so called hype... oh well, still would not trade him for anyone that made the list :bonesflag:

 

[fro daddy]

no offence holvy, crick is a darn good player, but i would trade him for clayborn in a heartbeat

 

[Pedro Guerrero]

How is Nick Fairley not on this team?

 

[Nexus]

no offence holvy, crick is a darn good player, but i would trade him for clayborn in a heartbeat

Well you wouldn't have to trade because they play different positions. Clayborn is a DE while Crick is a DT.

Clayborn fell short in every statistical category but one this season compared to 2009.

Note: Bolded numbers are 2010 stats. Non-bolded numbers are 2009 stats.

Adrian Clayborn

51 tkl. . .70 tkl

9 tfl. . .23 tfl

4 sacks. . .12 sacks

1 pbu. . .2 pbu

1 ff. . .4 ff

6 qbh. . .9 qbh

1 blk. . .1 blk

Furthermore, Crick's stats this season are better than Clayborn's which is impressive considering Crick is an interior lineman. DE's typically produce more than DT's on average.

Jared Crick

60 tkl. . .73 tkl

14 tfl. . .15 tfl

7.5 sacks. . .9.5 sacks

1 pbu. . .4 pbu

9 qbh. . .16 qbh

1 ff. . .

. . .2 fumrec

. . .1 blk

 

[holvy83]

no offence holvy, crick is a darn good player, but i would trade him for clayborn in a heartbeat

he will get his all american accolades, but does not look as impressive with the way the Hawks season went... and to me Iowa's season= :rollin

 

[JTrain]

Clayborn got this based only on a great 2009 season. This year he's been pretty disappointing. I lost count of how many times a tired Iowa offense gave up a game-winning drive in the fourth quarter, and a lot of Hawk fans accused him of basically quitting in the fourth quarter.

Not that I think Crick deserves first team either. Besides, Crick is a DT and Clayborn a DE. Do they specify or just take the best four DL?

 

[NUance]

no offence holvy, crick is a darn good player, but i would trade him for clayborn in a heartbeat

Well you wouldn't have to trade because they play different positions. Clayborn is a DE while Crick is a DT.

Clayborn fell short in every statistical category but one this season compared to 2009.

Note: Bolded numbers are 2010 stats. Non-bolded numbers are 2009 stats.

Adrian Clayborn

51 tkl. . .70 tkl

9 tfl. . .23 tfl

4 sacks. . .12 sacks

1 pbu. . .2 pbu

1 ff. . .4 ff

6 qbh. . .9 qbh

1 blk. . .1 blk

Furthermore, Crick's stats this season are better than Clayborn's which is impressive considering Crick is an interior lineman. DE's typically produce more than DT's on average.

Jared Crick

60 tkl. . .73 tkl

14 tfl. . .15 tfl

7.5 sacks. . .9.5 sacks

1 pbu. . .4 pbu

9 qbh. . .16 qbh

1 ff. . .

. . .2 fumrec

. . .1 blk

Impressive numbers for an interior lineman. Crick would make a great DE too. Real quick off the ball and good footspeed. Like the big framed DEs we had ten years ago.

 

[gobiggergoredder]

Here's my favorite.

Will Snyderwine - All American PK

Career/Season Stats

Alex Henery - Future Millionaire

Career/Season Stats

 

[Nexus]

Here's my favorite.

Will Snyderwine

Career/Season Stats

Alex Henery

Career/Season Stats

Yeah, it baffles me that Henery was snubbed. Perhaps 2nd team All-American, maybe? Regardless, he's 1st team worthy.

 

[Nexus]

no offence holvy, crick is a darn good player, but i would trade him for clayborn in a heartbeat

Well you wouldn't have to trade because they play different positions. Clayborn is a DE while Crick is a DT.

Clayborn fell short in every statistical category but one this season compared to 2009.

Note: Bolded numbers are 2010 stats. Non-bolded numbers are 2009 stats.

Adrian Clayborn

51 tkl. . .70 tkl

9 tfl. . .23 tfl

4 sacks. . .12 sacks

1 pbu. . .2 pbu

1 ff. . .4 ff

6 qbh. . .9 qbh

1 blk. . .1 blk

Furthermore, Crick's stats this season are better than Clayborn's which is impressive considering Crick is an interior lineman. DE's typically produce more than DT's on average.

Jared Crick

60 tkl. . .73 tkl

14 tfl. . .15 tfl

7.5 sacks. . .9.5 sacks

1 pbu. . .4 pbu

9 qbh. . .16 qbh

1 ff. . .

. . .2 fumrec

. . .1 blk

Impressive numbers for an interior lineman. Crick would make a great DE too. Real quick off the ball and good footspeed. Like the big framed DEs we had ten years ago.

I agree. Wouldn't be surprised if some NFL team uses him as a DE.

 

[melscott62]

Clayborn got this based only on a great 2009 season. This year he's been pretty disappointing. I lost count of how many times a tired Iowa offense gave up a game-winning drive in the fourth quarter, and a lot of Hawk fans accused him of basically quitting in the fourth quarter.

Not that I think Crick deserves first team either. Besides, Crick is a DT and Clayborn a DE. Do they specify or just take the best four DL?

they shouldnt lump them all together...... its so much easier to get stats as a DE. my question is what DT has had a better year? I'm sure there is someone, but I doubt there is more that 2-3 guys.