Censorship

I'm sure the GOP-led federal government will be eager and glad to make sure that schools, and students who are peacefully and legally protesting, won't suffer unjust punishment due to some rogue fringe opportunists.

We've all seen their ability to wisely discern the differences with their history of refusing to paint Black Lives Matter protests as inherently violent riots.
Again, I am all for protesting but if you take over a college building or if you block students from getting to class you should be mocked and smacked.  

Protest all you want on the student union grass where people can still walk freely to class.  They can still see you and hear you, but they can also get to class.  

 
Again, I am all for protesting but if you take over a college building or if you block students from getting to class you should be mocked and smacked.  

Protest all you want on the student union grass where people can still walk freely to class.  They can still see you and hear you, but they can also get to class.  
This is the way

 
I do find time to enjoy family, friends, and entertainment, but the man you voted for at least twice has been utterly despicable in ways the affect me, my family, and whatever you once defined as America.

What's not to be angry about?  
Bummer.   Outside of the stock market correction these past two weeks which is no bueno, my daily life hasn’t really been affected at all.  
 

I wish you all the best going forward.  

 
*Important disclaimer that none of this has been completely proven or verified as of right now*

Someone on reddit, who's posting history is fairly sparse but is varied and seems normal, including multiple posts from a month+ ago in the aws sub claiming to work for aws, is claiming that a government client has told them they would not renew their contract unless certain Trump/GOP critical books were removed from amazon's online store.

this is INSANE. I work for a very large cloud services provider. We have a lot of government clients. Another side of our company sells books online (you have 100% heard of them.) Today, my boss got this email that one of our largest gov clients is going to CANCEL their contract if we don't remove these books that are critical of Trump. This is NUTS!! We have NOTHING to do with the book side of the business, and even if we did, this is CENSORSHIP!!! I can't believe this is happening. My boss is pulling his hair out over this. No one knows what to do.



kpvhpa5btote1.png


 
You know, on one hand, we've got folks being disappeared and deported for such crimes as having tattoos or protesting against inhumane war crimes, as well as government agencies presenting actual credible assaults on free speech.

490359048_10100627556634909_8874715890182227298_n.jpg


But ya know, on the other hand, some elite out of touch professors who say "Latinx" are really annoying, liberal cancel culture has ended a handful of high profile careers, and trans folks shouldn't have the right to request that we refer to them in a way that feels respectful. Real slippery slope, 1984 dystopian stuff. 

 
I guess this falls under censorship.  But it could have been placed under an authoritarianism thread,  the Trump Cult thread and any number of threads dealing with the blind allegiance to the current Felon Cult leader.  

Speaker Johnson is blocking requests by congressmen to obtain disclosures from the Trump admin.  Congress as officially given up its oversight into investigating the executive branch and has given up its responsibilities and duties under the constitution.  Johnson has in effect made Trump a king responsible to no one.  What a huge surrender to an inept fool.    2026 can't get here quick enough so we can replace these weak cowards who lead both the house and the senate.

https://www.leefang.com/p/speaker-johnson-plans-vote-to-curb

The House of Representatives will vote on Tuesday for a change in rules that will prevent lawmakers requesting disclosures from the Trump administration.

The shift, quietly released last night by Republican leaders, will shut down so-called “Resolutions of Inquiry” – a congressional tool for demanding factual information or documents in the possession of the president or from a cabinet secretary – through September 30th.

The rules reclassify legislative days to prevent the enactment of the investigative resolutions:


 




 
Resolutions of inquiry have existed since the very first Congress to seek answers from the executive branch. If passed in the committee of jurisdiction, the resolution gains “privileged” status and goes directly to a full vote before the entire chamber.

In recent weeks, a number of these investigative resolutions have been introduced. One such resolution demands documents about Elon Musk's status as a special government employee and to disclose information about his potential conflicts of interest. Another resolution requests information about whether DOGE is using artificial intelligence to identify cuts and impose layoff decisions in the federal government.

Rep. Adam Smith, D-Washington State, sponsored a resolution to produce answers on the so-called “Signalgate” controversy, including the extent to which the administration uses the messaging app to discuss national security matters.

The attempt to shut down the resolution of inquiry process outside of an emergency appears to be without precedent.

“Speaker Johnson is trying to blind Congress and take away one of the only tools where the majority of Representatives, unfiltered by party leadership, can conduct oversight,” said Sean Vitka of Demand Progress, a watchdog group.

Vitka's organization notes that the Signalgate resolution only requires just two members of House Armed Services Committee Republican lawmakers to pass. Gaining two GOP lawmakers on the committee would force a full House floor vote by the end of next week.

The rules that govern the procedures for such inquiries were first adopted in 1879. Any member, regardless of party or seniority, can propose an inquiry and resolutions may pass on a simple-majority vote.

During the 1970s, the resolutions became a vital tool for lawmakers to obtain information about the ongoing Vietnam War. In more recent years, House members have proposed inquiries related to the 2008 bank bailouts, immigration data, and nuclear safety records, among other issues.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I guess this falls under censorship.  But it could have been placed under an authoritarianism thread,  the Trump Cult thread and any number of threads dealing with the blind allegiance to the current Felon Cult leader.  

Speaker Johnson is blocking requests by congressmen to obtain disclosures from the Trump admin.  Congress as officially given up its oversight into investigating the executive branch and has given up its responsibilities and duties under the constitution.  Johnson has in effect made Trump a king responsible to no one.  What a huge surrender to an inept fool.    2026 can't get here quick enough so we can replace these weak cowards who lead both the house and the senate.

https://www.leefang.com/p/speaker-johnson-plans-vote-to-curb
i was assured that the guard rails would hold. oh well.

 
Back
Top