Do we have a Historical Offense?

Mind boggling thoughts. Now if only we could have that 2009 D and this year's offense we'd be top 10 at least if not a game or two away from playing for the BCS championship.

 
This offense has some good stats, but it's too godamn sloppy. Stats don't tell the whole story. I know we have a good offense, clearly one of the best we've had in probably the last 10 years or so, and that's why it's so frustrating when we lose or struggle against sh**ty teams.

 
This offense has some good stats, but it's too godamn sloppy. Stats don't tell the whole story. I know we have a good offense, clearly one of the best we've had in probably the last 10 years or so, and that's why it's so frustrating when we lose or struggle against sh**ty teams.
I know how yous kids likes 'em sloppy!
I gave you a +1 simply for the "Billy Madison" reference. LOL.

 
spread offense meant to get the playmakers the ball, we happen to have alot of them :) ....on that note just think of the juggernaut the offense will be next year, and prob years to come chuckleshuffle

 
This offense has some good stats, but it's too godamn sloppy. Stats don't tell the whole story. I know we have a good offense, clearly one of the best we've had in probably the last 10 years or so, and that's why it's so frustrating when we lose or struggle against sh**ty teams.
+1. There's a couple of things they could improve. Turnovers and Points. Points is what it's all about right? Yard stats are sometimes misleading.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This offense has some good stats, but it's too godamn sloppy. Stats don't tell the whole story. I know we have a good offense, clearly one of the best we've had in probably the last 10 years or so, and that's why it's so frustrating when we lose or struggle against sh**ty teams.
Most of the time Historical....but on a few occasions just hysterical...

 
Back
Top