I really don't think it's that unfair of an article.
* Yes, they're good coaches (we hope), but it's also year 1. It takes time for coaches to put their stamp on a program.
* They're installing new schemes on offense and defense.
* DT may be a strength, but LB and DE are extremely shaky positions.
* The OL has not been exceptionally strong or well coached in recent years. Three starters graduated.
* By most accounts, Ameer saved our butts last year and was the entire offense. He's gone. We have guys, but will they be of Ameer's caliber?
* With all due respect to the rest of our receivers, I'll believe we can replace Kenny Bell's productivity and deep threat in this offense when I see it.
* Our QB is a tough dude, but he was pretty shaky last year. The article is right, his development is key.
* There's some talent in the secondary, but stopping pass offenses was Bo's forte. I don't think it's unreasonable to assume they will take a step back in this area, although of course I'd trade that for not getting gashed on the jet sweep.
The main thing in Nebraska's advantage is the schedule. But as we've learned recently, you don't show up and win games just because you're Nebraska. Those teams coached by Jerry Kill and Pat Fitzgerald and even Kirk Ferentz aren't exactly pushovers. So if all things go smoothly, then I'm sure 9 games will be no trouble and they could even do better. "All things going smoothly" however, is never a guarantee, especially in year 1.