Revenue numbers for NCAA schools

[TonyStalloni]

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/schools/finances/?siteID=je6NUbpObpQ-XQunU51_93C_.0gVE40Iwg

I'm assuming this is athletic dept revenue. I'm surprised by a few of the Big Ten schools. Wisconsin at #2, Iowa at #11 and Minnesota at #15. Also Louisville at #18 and Illinois and Rutgers were higher than I would have guessed. Nebraska comes in at #26. A bit lower than I thought. I would have said we'd be in the top 20.

 

[Landlord]

We still don't get much full share from the conference which really hurts.

 

[BigRedBuster]

Only 7 schools are not subsidized. I still fail to see where the athletes make the schools so much money. Looks to me that with all but 7 schools, the athletes cost the schools money.

 

[huKSer]

Only 7 schools are not subsidized. I still fail to see where the athletes make the schools so much money. Looks to me that with all but 7 schools, the athletes cost the schools money.

Texas, Ohio St, Oklahoma, LSU, Penn St, Nebraska, Purdue - four of seven from Big Ten

Annnnnnd . . . "One of these schools are not like the others, one of these schools doesn't belong . . . ."

 

[Abdullah the Butcher]

Purdue reformed their tuition and spending, acting financially smart.