Huskerzoo
New member
For me, this season has been very eye opening with regard to the players on the team and player management. While our recruiting hasn't been bad lately, our turnover is absurd. I think most of it makes sense, that is to say I'm not concerned, but I think I had been optimistic than was warranted. My concerns focused a lot on the lines, I regularly came to the board to argue this, but the numbers overall are rough.
I'm not going to look at 2019's class yet, but the three classes before that were hit hard.
2015: Many players gone via graduation these are the RS SRs. But for context, on D or O, we have 5 of these guys on the 2 deep, one of which is a walk-on.
2016: 13 of 21 players from the class are still around (rJR or SR) 12 on the 2 deep
2017: 10 of 20 (rSO or JR) 8 on the 2 deep
2018: 15 of 24 (rFr or SO) 9 on the 2 deep (subject to change)
2019: Still being evaluated (Fr) 4 on the 2 deep
Left out transfers and Juco guys.
That's 58% roughly of the classes still playing for us. That's adding 38 scholarship players over the 3 years that should be making up the core of our team. Notably these players were recruiting to play other positions frequently. It feels like skill players have by and large been able to navigate this better, but it's certainly a problem as it relates to our line play and our LB.
While I don't think I have any huge point to make, I think it's important that we take performance in context. The top FR and SO in the country can come in and start, we're not able to recruit those guys in a consistent way. We're going to be more of a Wisconsin style team in our recruiting than a Bama. That means we should see lots of RS JRs and above starting for us, with the occasional FR and SO doing work. I think realistically what that means is we've got another year or 2 of inconsistent play in the fold as we fix the culture and get the right players.
It was never an overnight fix. It just happens to be worse than most of us anticipated.
I'm not going to look at 2019's class yet, but the three classes before that were hit hard.
2015: Many players gone via graduation these are the RS SRs. But for context, on D or O, we have 5 of these guys on the 2 deep, one of which is a walk-on.
2016: 13 of 21 players from the class are still around (rJR or SR) 12 on the 2 deep
2017: 10 of 20 (rSO or JR) 8 on the 2 deep
2018: 15 of 24 (rFr or SO) 9 on the 2 deep (subject to change)
2019: Still being evaluated (Fr) 4 on the 2 deep
Left out transfers and Juco guys.
That's 58% roughly of the classes still playing for us. That's adding 38 scholarship players over the 3 years that should be making up the core of our team. Notably these players were recruiting to play other positions frequently. It feels like skill players have by and large been able to navigate this better, but it's certainly a problem as it relates to our line play and our LB.
While I don't think I have any huge point to make, I think it's important that we take performance in context. The top FR and SO in the country can come in and start, we're not able to recruit those guys in a consistent way. We're going to be more of a Wisconsin style team in our recruiting than a Bama. That means we should see lots of RS JRs and above starting for us, with the occasional FR and SO doing work. I think realistically what that means is we've got another year or 2 of inconsistent play in the fold as we fix the culture and get the right players.
It was never an overnight fix. It just happens to be worse than most of us anticipated.