WCHusker

I edited some posts made by WCHusker in this thread as a member had complained that he thought they were racist. I had already PM'd WCHusker about this post as I knew we would get a complaint on it, hell I took it as a racist comment. I gave him an opportunity to change the post and gave him several minutes to do so as he was on the board. He didn't edit the posts so I had no choice, but to edit them. He has since called "the mods" out in reference to us editing these posts in the above thread. I pm'd him again advising him that he had his opportunity to edit the posts, but didn't do so I had no choice. If he continues with his behavior in reference to these edits, I will be raising his warning level as I'm simply not going to put up with it. He's been the most negative out of any of our members in the past few days and has been displaying even more of a bad attitude compared to everyone else. Now granted, it's to be expected, but he's being a little ridiculous about it. You can find the posts that were edited in the active report section if you would like to review them.

 
I agree, he's been kinda pushing things for awhile. Not enough to draw a ban but enough to raise an eyebrow or two.

GBR

 
Is this the guy that used to have the Taylor Gabbert avatar or is that someone else? Because it doesn't sound like the same poster but I think the user name is similar.

At any rate, he's been one angry cat for the past few days...

I think with those types of posts we can just mark then unapproved. Rather than edit it to say they were edited.

 
Is this the guy that used to have the Taylor Gabbert avatar or is that someone else? Because it doesn't sound like the same poster but I think the user name is similar.

At any rate, he's been one angry cat for the past few days...

I think with those types of posts we can just mark then unapproved. Rather than edit it to say they were edited.
Yep, same cat. I didn't even think about the unapproved option. I guess I just like stirring the pot. :) Kidding of course.....

 
The Tyler Gabbert guy has been on the edge of things for a long time now. Never enough to warrant warnings, but enough that I notice his posts.

He seems likely to be the kind of guy who would get a warning and then go totally off the deep end. If anyone has to give him a warning, be sure you're around to catch the aftermath.

 
He's banned. He's already got three warnings, and I probably should have banned him after the crap last week when he got his panties in a wad over my locking some else's thread asking about how to view the game on-line.

Guys, if you are attacked by a member - I don't mean someone that just challenges what we do, but someone that gets personal - make sure you start a topic in here about it, with a link to the post where the attack came. As I've said, I don't really care what they say to me - I won't tolerate that crap against the Mods.

Thanks.

 
Remember that one dude that called me a flamer back in 2008 over the Bill Ayers at UNL thing? We should have a "Classcs" forum with that in there. It was goooooood stuff.

 
Remember that one dude that called me a flamer back in 2008 over the Bill Ayers at UNL thing? We should have a "Classcs" forum with that in there. It was goooooood stuff.
God, no - if we included all of the attacks on me, it'll rival the "Last to Post" thread in length...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top