zoogs
New member
A fascinating, charged, and nuanced article:
Jezebel: What should we say about David Bowie and Lori Maddox?
A passage towards the end that I found particularly engaging:
Jezebel: What should we say about David Bowie and Lori Maddox?
A passage towards the end that I found particularly engaging:
A really well-written and thoughtful piece. It had me going through more of what the author (Jia Tolentino)'s work. A lot of very good reading there.You can understand that the way she consented to the loss of her virginity could have been the way women have consented throughout history under implicit duress and formative coercion, and yet as wholeheartedly as we could understand.
There are no precise enough words or satisfying enough conclusions to fully account for her story, or any like it. It's easy to see what Bowie represents here: a sexual norm that has always appallingly favored men, and the abuse that stems from and surpasses even that. It is easy to denounce the part Bowie played in this, even with any number of purportedly mitigating factors: the political context, Maddox's story, the fact that he lived with generosity and openness, the less generous fact that his synapses were perpetually blitzed with cocaine. It is less easy to turn over what Maddox evinces in this narrative, from the late 1970s to her account of it now which is that women have developed the vastly unfair, nonetheless remarkable, and still essential ability to find pleasure and freedom in a system that oppresses them.
Last edited by a moderator: