Wyoming game Re-Air on BTN?

It's really frustrating to see that even BTN.com doesn't have details on the shows they list. I don't want to record every Big Ten Football in 60 to catch our game.

 
The Dude said:
knapplc said:
It's really frustrating to see that even BTN.com doesn't have details on the shows they list. I don't want to record every Big Ten Football in 60 to catch our game.
Click to expand...
I noticed this too. But I was thinking they had details last year?
Click to expand...
I believe they did last year.

Likely this is an early-season glitch. It's not about athleticism, and it's fixable, so we'll be OK.

 
I'll bet they play different games in different regions. Even so, not sure why they can't provide details for each region.

 
Does anybody really want to rewatch that game?
default_laugh.png


 
huskerjock said:
Does anybody really want to rewatch that game?
default_laugh.png
Click to expand...
I did. I was actually pleased with a lot of things on the rewatch. If TM doesn't throw that pick, we probably go up 40-21 and we'd be complaining about giving up 400+ yards instead of the 600.

Athleticism on D is much better than last year. Concerned about the coaches' approach to the game - seems like instead of just playing they're trying to "stay vanilla" which I think is a terrible idea. But we'll know a lot more after UCLA.

 
knapplc said:
The Dude said:
knapplc said:
It's really frustrating to see that even BTN.com doesn't have details on the shows they list. I don't want to record every Big Ten Football in 60 to catch our game.
Click to expand...
I noticed this too. But I was thinking they had details last year?
Click to expand...
I believe they did last year.

Likely this is an early-season glitch. It's not about athleticism, and it's fixable, so we'll be OK.
Click to expand...
It's a process. You have to execute the process in order to process the execution.

 
walksalone said:
watching the end is going to be tough...
Click to expand...
Already watched it a second time. It's amazing how the game changed. At 6:48 in the fourth quarter we had a 16-point lead, the ball, and we were moving down the field on a good drive. We get even a field goal at that point and we're having VERY different conversations on this board these past two days.

That INT was pure luck. Taylor threw the ball to within about a foot of the correct spot, just slightly behind the WR. I can't tell who the WR was on that play, but he wasn't looking for the ball. Had he been, it's likely an incompletion. He didn't even know he was being thrown at until the pick had already happened. Then on back-to-back plays Mitchell and Cooper got beat - badly - and gave up big completions. Two poor coverages, two missed tackles, and boom - TD.

Then, on the fourth-and-one on our next possession, they had TOTALLY sold out to stop the QB sneak. Had we run a play like Missouri did against us on fourth-and-short in 2010 (Helu's big day), it likely would have gone for a big gain, if not a TD.

But that was the story of the whole game. We did nothing beyond the extreme basics. A vast majority of our runs were between the tackles, regardless of how many guys they put in the box.

It was a baffling game on several fronts.

 
knapplc said:
walksalone said:
watching the end is going to be tough...
Click to expand...
Already watched it a second time. It's amazing how the game changed. At 6:48 in the fourth quarter we had a 16-point lead, the ball, and we were moving down the field on a good drive. We get even a field goal at that point and we're having VERY different conversations on this board these past two days.

That INT was pure luck. Taylor threw the ball to within about a foot of the correct spot, just slightly behind the WR. I can't tell who the WR was on that play, but he wasn't looking for the ball. Had he been, it's likely an incompletion. He didn't even know he was being thrown at until the pick had already happened. Then on back-to-back plays Mitchell and Cooper got beat - badly - and gave up big completions. Two poor coverages, two missed tackles, and boom - TD.

Then, on the fourth-and-one on our next possession, they had TOTALLY sold out to stop the QB sneak. Had we run a play like Missouri did against us on fourth-and-short in 2010 (Helu's big day), it likely would have gone for a big gain, if not a TD.

But that was the story of the whole game. We did nothing beyond the extreme basics. A vast majority of our runs were between the tackles, regardless of how many guys they put in the box.

It was a baffling game on several fronts.
Click to expand...
I guess what troubles me more than the lucky INT, is why even throw the ball at that point? If we're running the ball, the clock is running, and their chances of winning decrease with each tick of the clock.

 
knapplc said:
walksalone said:
watching the end is going to be tough...
Click to expand...
Already watched it a second time. It's amazing how the game changed. At 6:48 in the fourth quarter we had a 16-point lead, the ball, and we were moving down the field on a good drive. We get even a field goal at that point and we're having VERY different conversations on this board these past two days.

That INT was pure luck. Taylor threw the ball to within about a foot of the correct spot, just slightly behind the WR. I can't tell who the WR was on that play, but he wasn't looking for the ball. Had he been, it's likely an incompletion. He didn't even know he was being thrown at until the pick had already happened. Then on back-to-back plays Mitchell and Cooper got beat - badly - and gave up big completions. Two poor coverages, two missed tackles, and boom - TD.

Then, on the fourth-and-one on our next possession, they had TOTALLY sold out to stop the QB sneak. Had we run a play like Missouri did against us on fourth-and-short in 2010 (Helu's big day), it likely would have gone for a big gain, if not a TD.

But that was the story of the whole game. We did nothing beyond the extreme basics. A vast majority of our runs were between the tackles, regardless of how many guys they put in the box.

It was a baffling game on several fronts.
Click to expand...
The WR on the INT was Burtch. Martinez said it was a miscommunication and he was expecting Burtch to break (and, obviously, look) sooner.

Not sure how many QB sneaks Martinez has run in 3+ years but I don't think it's many. Would really have liked to see Imani get that carry.

 
walksalone said:
I guess what troubles me more than the lucky INT, is why even throw the ball at that point? If we're running the ball, the clock is running, and their chances of winning decrease with each tick of the clock.
Click to expand...
I'm sure we threw because it was 3rd & six. We'd had good luck converting first downs on those short throws. Would have been better if it was Enunwa or Bell.

 
Back
Top