Douschebag Hall of Fame
- Thread starter skersOVRsc
- Start date
Count 'Bility
Banned
skersfan. Is f'ing skersfan in here yet? Probably is. I dont care. He's gettin another nomination. He's back on his anti-Bo powertrip. Just waiting for the "my wifes in anger management diagnosing fuckity f#*k".. This guy"s a complete assbag.
HuskerShark
Banned
ADS
New member
I'm positive this isn't his first time in to DBHOS. But man, he needs to be in here more than anyother poster as of right now. His posts make me wanna rage.
Count 'Bility
Banned
Like i said in a thread last night, his opinions were actually halfway legitimate after the Ohio St game. No one can argue that there were questions across the board at that point. But now, after the ESPN thing, in a thread where most to all are either furious or taking our side in the thing, he finds a way to get his "i told you so moment". He tries to sneak in his "he's doing better" and "i dont want him fired" 's, but it's easily documented that he has a huge distaste for Bo Pelini.
Lyons in the Sea of Red.
New member
I nominate Jim Delaney, your greed is showing strong today
Hammerhead
New member
As a corollary, I nominate anyone who thinks that picking up Rutgers and Maryland is good for the B1G for any reason other than the conference making more money.
ZRod
Active member
redout22
New member
The terps will definitely bring money in basketball and could rise again.. Plus they have sweet uni's
HuskerShark
Banned
Last edited by a moderator:
If by "sweet unis," you mean "looks like someone with hemorrhoids took a bloody sh#t on a golden checkerboard," then hell yeah bro I'm with you.
walksalone
New member
Only reason I'm for Rutgers joining, is every 2 or 3 years, I get to the Huskers beat the a$$ off of Rutgers, and their self righteous, f*ckbag fans...
Nebula
New member
Am I in the wrong for bristling when I see a Penn State fan wearing a jersey with "Paterno" emblazoned on the back?
It seems like there is enough evidence to hesitantly assert that Joe could have done more to prevent the sexual abuse of children. (Hesitate, because I wasn't privy to anything that occurred. How could I state anything with absolute certainty?)
It pisses me off. And I'm honestly asking you guys: is that a valid response? Or is my irritation groundless?
Nebula
New member
Kirk Herbstreit: You're actually pretty decent at announcing a football game. However, if you want to respected as an expert on the sport, you need to study the history of the game. When an icon retires, a good example of the proper way to pay due homage to one of the true innovators of the game is to follow the lead of what your colleague Chris Fowler did. I'm not talking about declaring '95 NU as the greatest ever. That's subjective. What isn't is the ingenuity of the Tom Osborne playbook. Any half-way informed coach or student of the game will rave about his blocking schemes alone. For good reason.
When it was your turn to talk about Osborne, you gave some lukewarm anecdote that wasn't insulting to TO or any Nebraska fan, or out of line, or anything like that. It really just made you look uninformed. It was diminishing to your reputation as far as being someone whose overall opinion is worth consideration. You call a pretty solid game, but that's going to be where it ends if you can't even offer some solid input on one of the truly elite minds to ever participate in the sport. Your take on Osborne was vapid, completely lacking in terms of giving legitimate credit to a truly revolutionary offensive mind in CFB, and painted you as someone who didn't really know what they were talking about. It was amateurish. Poorly done.
If you are passionate about CFB, you'd do well to honor those who've earned it. Last weekend you sounded like a self-proclaimed expert on physics who seemed to maybe know a little bit about Isaac Newton. Maybe.
You want to be taken seriously? Then take serious those who have impacted the sport to the greatest degree. Otherwise, your view on anything outside of calling a live game is meaningless.
When it was your turn to talk about Osborne, you gave some lukewarm anecdote that wasn't insulting to TO or any Nebraska fan, or out of line, or anything like that. It really just made you look uninformed. It was diminishing to your reputation as far as being someone whose overall opinion is worth consideration. You call a pretty solid game, but that's going to be where it ends if you can't even offer some solid input on one of the truly elite minds to ever participate in the sport. Your take on Osborne was vapid, completely lacking in terms of giving legitimate credit to a truly revolutionary offensive mind in CFB, and painted you as someone who didn't really know what they were talking about. It was amateurish. Poorly done.
If you are passionate about CFB, you'd do well to honor those who've earned it. Last weekend you sounded like a self-proclaimed expert on physics who seemed to maybe know a little bit about Isaac Newton. Maybe.
You want to be taken seriously? Then take serious those who have impacted the sport to the greatest degree. Otherwise, your view on anything outside of calling a live game is meaningless.