B1G Head-to-Head Records

[StPaulHusker]

Allowing 48PPG/avg against Wisconsin is an embarrassment. I understand that average went up when we allowed 70 in the CCG, but it shows we aren't where we want to be, let alone need to be on either side of the ball.

very happy to see Brett pack up his things. i wonder if he wasn't just one of those coaches that had Pelini's number? Similar to how we seemed to struggle against Iowa State towards the end of our B12 time. Couldn't really explain it, but you could always count on it being a tough game. Ohio State/Illinois seems to play out like that quite frequently (purdue as well I think).

So you would rather a coach leave then have our coach try to figure out the best way to beat him? Were you around for Osborne-Switzer? Osborne-Bowden?

If it came to it, I would love to have seen Pelini beat Bielema (which he did by the way). But on the same token, I'm not unhappy to see him ship off to Arkansas.

I'm not unhappy either. But it's because he was a jerk not because for 10 out of 12 quarters he had Pelini's number.

 

[kchusker_chris]

Allowing 48PPG/avg against Wisconsin is an embarrassment. I understand that average went up when we allowed 70 in the CCG, but it shows we aren't where we want to be, let alone need to be on either side of the ball.

very happy to see Brett pack up his things. i wonder if he wasn't just one of those coaches that had Pelini's number? Similar to how we seemed to struggle against Iowa State towards the end of our B12 time. Couldn't really explain it, but you could always count on it being a tough game. Ohio State/Illinois seems to play out like that quite frequently (purdue as well I think).

So you would rather a coach leave then have our coach try to figure out the best way to beat him? Were you around for Osborne-Switzer? Osborne-Bowden?

You got all of that from what I said huh? No, I wasn't around from Osborn-Switzer, and didn't see much of Osborne-Bowden. But, my guess is that 99% of Nebraska fans would have enjoyed seeing Bowden pack up his things and us win a National Championship in 1993, versus losing by a controversial 2 because Bowden had Osborne's number in the early 90's. I certainly would have enjoyed that NC (and 3 in a row).

And, unfortunately I don't have much of a say in where Brett coaches...so the circumstances are what they are, and I'm glad we won't be facing him every year now.

 

[StPaulHusker]

Allowing 48PPG/avg against Wisconsin is an embarrassment. I understand that average went up when we allowed 70 in the CCG, but it shows we aren't where we want to be, let alone need to be on either side of the ball.

very happy to see Brett pack up his things. i wonder if he wasn't just one of those coaches that had Pelini's number? Similar to how we seemed to struggle against Iowa State towards the end of our B12 time. Couldn't really explain it, but you could always count on it being a tough game. Ohio State/Illinois seems to play out like that quite frequently (purdue as well I think).

So you would rather a coach leave then have our coach try to figure out the best way to beat him? Were you around for Osborne-Switzer? Osborne-Bowden?

You got all of that from what I said huh? No, I wasn't around from Osborn-Switzer, and didn't see much of Osborne-Bowden. But, my guess is that 99% of Nebraska fans would have enjoyed seeing Bowden pack up his things and us win a National Championship in 1993, versus losing by a controversial 2 because Bowden had Osborne's number in the early 90's. I certainly would have enjoyed that NC (and 3 in a row).

And, unfortunately I don't have much of a say in where Brett coaches...so the circumstances are what they are, and I'm glad we won't be facing him every year now.

Bielema leaving doesn't necessarily make Wisconsin easier to beat. And I must be in the 1% because I would rather have our coach get it figured out like Osborne did then to rejoice about a coach leaving thinking that the move would be a savior to our team. I like the competition it brings. Wisconsin was for sure going to be a great rivalry with BB as coach. Now? Who knows?

 

[kchusker_chris]

Wisconsin was for sure going to be a great rivalry with BB as coach. Now? Who knows?

In the same way that Colorado was a "great" rivalry. I could care less about Wisconsin. They are the #4 or #5 team in the conference in any given year.

 

[StPaulHusker]

Wisconsin was for sure going to be a great rivalry with BB as coach. Now? Who knows?

In the same way that Colorado was a "great" rivalry. I could care less about Wisconsin. They are the #4 or #5 team in the conference in any given year.

3 straight Big Ten Championships would disagree with you. And I don't believe I said anything about Colorado nor do I care about Colorado.

 

[kchusker_chris]

Wisconsin was for sure going to be a great rivalry with BB as coach. Now? Who knows?

In the same way that Colorado was a "great" rivalry. I could care less about Wisconsin. They are the #4 or #5 team in the conference in any given year.

3 straight Big Ten Championships would disagree with you. And I don't believe I said anything about Colorado nor do I care about Colorado.

I said Colorado when I was comparing Wisconsin to them. Colorado had some championships and a few wins over us as well. They'll fall back into their place in the conference just like we'll eventually rise to ours. At this point, 90% of the time we aren't even in the discussion - it's all Michigan/Ohio State. That needs to change.

 

[It'sNotAFakeID]

Wisconsin was for sure going to be a great rivalry with BB as coach. Now? Who knows?

In the same way that Colorado was a "great" rivalry. I could care less about Wisconsin. They are the #4 or #5 team in the conference in any given year.

3 straight Big Ten Championships would disagree with you. And I don't believe I said anything about Colorado nor do I care about Colorado.

I said Colorado when I was comparing Wisconsin to them. Colorado had some championships and a few wins over us as well. They'll fall back into their place in the conference just like we'll eventually rise to ours. At this point, 90% of the time we aren't even in the discussion - it's all Michigan/Ohio State. That needs to change.

Michigan? Really?

The Michigan team who hasn't won the conference, let alone be a representative in the conference championship? That Michigan?

 

[kchusker_chris]

Michigan? Really?

The Michigan team who hasn't won the conference, let alone be a representative in the conference championship? That Michigan?

I'm not talking just the last few years. Every B1G discussion that talks about who the future big boys are going to be includes Ohio State and Michigan. I was reading an article the other day (SI - not Staples, but one of their other talking heads) discussing the SEC and who will end their dominance. When they were measuring up the B1G and started discussing the new divisions and yada yada, Nebraska didn't even get discussed. They predicted that most years the winner of the Michigan/Ohio State game will be representing the B1G in the Rose Bowl and/or playoff. Didn't even give us enough credit to mention that either of them would have to get by us (or the west winner) first. Understandably it's being viewed as though the B1G and the East division is quickly taking the competitive path that the B12 turned into w/ the North. We haven't exactly done much to dispel that theory so it is what it is.

 

[Count 'Bility]

Michigan? Really?

The Michigan team who hasn't won the conference, let alone be a representative in the conference championship? That Michigan?

I'm not talking just the last few years. Every B1G discussion that talks about who the future big boys are going to be includes Ohio State and Michigan. I was reading an article the other day (SI - not Staples, but one of their other talking heads) discussing the SEC and who will end their dominance. When they were measuring up the B1G and started discussing the new divisions and yada yada, Nebraska didn't even get discussed. They predicted that most years the winner of the Michigan/Ohio State game will be representing the B1G in the Rose Bowl and/or playoff. Didn't even give us enough credit to mention that either of them would have to get by us (or the west winner) first. Understandably it's being viewed as though the B1G and the East division is quickly taking the competitive path that the B12 turned into w/ the North. We haven't exactly done much to dispel that theory so it is what it is.

Or the fact that we're 1-1 against each of them.

 

[Landlord]

Wisconsin was for sure going to be a great rivalry with BB as coach. Now? Who knows?

In the same way that Colorado was a "great" rivalry. I could care less about Wisconsin. They are the #4 or #5 team in the conference in any given year.

And here we have a perfect representation of the opposing fanbase stereotypes of the insufferably arrogant Nebraska fan.

And it's couldn't*** care less. To say you could care less implies that you do in fact care.

 

[Hoosker]

Wisconsin was for sure going to be a great rivalry with BB as coach. Now? Who knows?

In the same way that Colorado was a "great" rivalry. I could care less about Wisconsin. They are the #4 or #5 team in the conference in any given year.

And here we have a perfect representation of the opposing fanbase stereotypes of the insufferably arrogant Nebraska fan.

And it's couldn't*** care less. To say you could care less implies that you do in fact care.

Everyone screws that expression up. I see it happen all the damn time.

 

[Excel]

Wisconsin was for sure going to be a great rivalry with BB as coach. Now? Who knows?

In the same way that Colorado was a "great" rivalry. I could care less about Wisconsin. They are the #4 or #5 team in the conference in any given year.

More like a 3-4 team every year:

Averages since 1993:

Big Ten Standings: Fourth (4.05)

Rankings among conference teams at close of season: 3.95

Standings to determine the Championship: Fourth (3.75)

In those seasons we've won the conference six times - more CC's than Nebraska won in that period.

Big Ten Championships since 1993:

Ohio State - 9

Wisconsin - 6

Michigan - 5

Northwestern -3

Iowa - 2

Michigan State - 1

Penn State - 1

Purdue - 1

Illinois - 1

So you can cast Wisconsin off as a "#4 or #5 team in the conference in any given year" but right now Nebraska has way more to prove in this conference than UW. As far as being a rival, I won't say that I "couldn't care less" about the Nebraska game because its a conference game and I always care but its no where near being a rivalry. Minnesota and Iowa are our historic rivals while lately the Michigan State games have been much more entertaining than the Nebraska showings... I'd even say that, at least on an emotional level, I care more about beating Illinois and Northwestern every year, so I agree with the sentiment there.

That's a Wisconsin fan's perspective, now as a Nebraska fan, why you wouldn't want us as a rival (in the sense that a person could "want" a rival), especially given the last two seasons, kind of escapes me. If we're going East/West then you're pretty much stuck with us and Iowa and if you care more about Iowa well...have fun with that.

 

[It'sNotAFakeID]

Wisconsin was for sure going to be a great rivalry with BB as coach. Now? Who knows?

In the same way that Colorado was a "great" rivalry. I could care less about Wisconsin. They are the #4 or #5 team in the conference in any given year.

More like a 3-4 team every year:

Averages since 1993:

Big Ten Standings: Fourth (4.05)

Rankings among conference teams at close of season: 3.95

Standings to determine the Championship: Fourth (3.75)

In those seasons we've won the conference six times - more CC's than Nebraska won in that period.

Big Ten Championships since 1993:

Ohio State - 9

Wisconsin - 6

Michigan - 5

Northwestern -3

Iowa - 2

Michigan State - 1

Penn State - 1

Purdue - 1

Illinois - 1

So you can cast Wisconsin off as a "#4 or #5 team in the conference in any given year" but right now Nebraska has way more to prove in this conference than UW. As far as being a rival, I won't say that I "couldn't care less" about the Nebraska game because its a conference game and I always care but its no where near being a rivalry. Minnesota and Iowa are our historic rivals while lately the Michigan State games have been much more entertaining than the Nebraska showings... I'd even say that, at least on an emotional level, I care more about beating Illinois and Northwestern every year, so I agree with the sentiment there.

That's a Wisconsin fan's perspective, now as a Nebraska fan, why you wouldn't want us as a rival (in the sense that a person could "want" a rival), especially given the last two seasons, kind of escapes me. If we're going East/West then you're pretty much stuck with us and Iowa and if you care more about Iowa well...have fun with that.

Of course we do, we're the new guy.

 

[walksalone]

Since it's only our 3rd year in the B1G, it might be a little too early to tell...

 

[StPaulHusker]

At the risk of derailing this thread, I am most nervous about Northwestern in the next couple of years. They are putting together a helluva recruiting class this year. If they can put it all together, teams in the West Division might be looking up at them.