zoogs
New member
Man. If you ask me banning guys sometimes results in more problems than they were causing originally.
Do you guys think repeated brief suspensions are better for the rulebreakers? If they are the real problem guys they will get fed up and stop coming back. Whereas sometimes you have guys that apparently, really, really love posting here and will just do everything they can to get around it, which is a pain to deal with.
As AR noted, it's really easy to get around an IP ban, so it's not a very powerful tool at our disposal.
Maybe even indefinite moderator approval, which I usually hate because I can't keep track of them. That'll still let them post - it just won't appear (except to us). Perhaps it sends the message in more effective terms though.
Do you guys think repeated brief suspensions are better for the rulebreakers? If they are the real problem guys they will get fed up and stop coming back. Whereas sometimes you have guys that apparently, really, really love posting here and will just do everything they can to get around it, which is a pain to deal with.
As AR noted, it's really easy to get around an IP ban, so it's not a very powerful tool at our disposal.
Maybe even indefinite moderator approval, which I usually hate because I can't keep track of them. That'll still let them post - it just won't appear (except to us). Perhaps it sends the message in more effective terms though.