Alabama Possibly looking at sanctions?

Don't worry, if Alabama gets caught, then we'll REALLY know it's time to fix the system. Because, you know, something is never a problem until it affects the $EC.

 
Take away that '12 ship. Now the Nebraska v. Bama dynasty debate isn't even close.
Really? I think that's a reach.
You take away the 2012 National Championship and Alabama has 2 within 4 years, or 3 withing 5 years if they make it through their "brutual SEC schedule" this year. I don't think that is a reach at all. The debate was very close with both having 3 within 4 years. If you take one away, it isn't even debatable.

 
Take away that '12 ship. Now the Nebraska v. Bama dynasty debate isn't even close.
Really? I think that's a reach.
You take away the 2012 National Championship and Alabama has 2 within 4 years, or 3 withing 5 years if they make it through their "brutual SEC schedule" this year. I don't think that is a reach at all. The debate was very close with both having 3 within 4 years. If you take one away, it isn't even debatable.
Do you think it really matters about championships being "vacated." It will be nothing more than a footnote and most will remember they still won those games. Just like USC. Just like Reggie Bush.

 
Take away that '12 ship. Now the Nebraska v. Bama dynasty debate isn't even close.
Really? I think that's a reach.
You take away the 2012 National Championship and Alabama has 2 within 4 years, or 3 withing 5 years if they make it through their "brutual SEC schedule" this year. I don't think that is a reach at all. The debate was very close with both having 3 within 4 years. If you take one away, it isn't even debatable.
If you are talking to someone about which championships belong in the record books, you may need to choose a different dance partner than an A&M fan.
default_eek3dance.gif




 
Take away that '12 ship. Now the Nebraska v. Bama dynasty debate isn't even close.
Really? I think that's a reach.
You take away the 2012 National Championship and Alabama has 2 within 4 years, or 3 withing 5 years if they make it through their "brutual SEC schedule" this year. I don't think that is a reach at all. The debate was very close with both having 3 within 4 years. If you take one away, it isn't even debatable.
If you are talking to someone about which championships belong in the record books, you may need to choose a different dance partner than an A&M fan.
default_eek3dance.gif
http://en.wikipedia....football_season

http://en.wikipedia....football_season

http://en.wikipedia....football_season

What's the issue?

That picture was taken before the "south division" was added to the 2010 conference championship year...which is claimed as a co-champion. All claims are factual.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Take away that '12 ship. Now the Nebraska v. Bama dynasty debate isn't even close.
Really? I think that's a reach.
You take away the 2012 National Championship and Alabama has 2 within 4 years, or 3 withing 5 years if they make it through their "brutual SEC schedule" this year. I don't think that is a reach at all. The debate was very close with both having 3 within 4 years. If you take one away, it isn't even debatable.
If you are talking to someone about which championships belong in the record books, you may need to choose a different dance partner than an A&M fan.
default_eek3dance.gif
http://en.wikipedia....football_season

http://en.wikipedia....football_season

http://en.wikipedia....football_season

What's the issue?

That picture was taken before the "south division" was added to the 2010 conference championship year...which is claimed as a co-champion. All claims are factual.
Probably the 1997 one. Just a guess. You should be embarrassed to have that on there.

 
Back
Top