For being dialed down, we saw both QBs running plays out of a bunch of different formations that we see with Taylor as QB. I'm actually very surprised at the amount of different looks Beck has shown SDSU.
What are you trying to ask me? I thought the thread was pretty straight forward? They both played well, pretty good spot to be in as a team with two good back-ups in case Martinez continues to be hurt or has issues in a game.Both QB's "what" played very well, exactly?What a spot to be in, both QB's played very well.
Yup. Blessing in disguise, if we go with TA or RKIII in lieu of Taylor Martinez--folks were chatty about Beck throwing too much on the offense's plate early on, and newer QBs will continue to force Beck to pare down the plays/looks/packages and refine what we do have.Agreed. Both look good.
I read that Beck said he was trying to do too much with the offense. They thought they had a lot of experience coming back so they could do more. They decided to be more focused and I'm sure even more so with less-experienced QBs. Not saying that's the only reason we look better but I bet it helped.
I suppose it's good we get this done during non-con instead of figuring this out the week before the Michigan game, yes?
Ok, I like Taylor, so there' s no 'Taylor-bashing' here but I wonder: Have we sacrificed former games because we didn't let these other two qb's play? I'm sorry but Tommy A. reminds me of Tommy F. That kid's got an arm! And Ron too! Oh my gosh! It was actually FUN watching that football game yesterday. I know, I know..it was SDSU However, there were other games in the past where you wonder if we could've won if Bo would've changed qb's? Just wondering. Any thoughts?
Ok, you make a great point. But lets figure out this quality opponent thing. I think that SDSU would beat Wyoming. And if they are not a quality opponent then why is our defense giving up 465 yards in total offense to them? As far is offense is concerend, TA and RK3 did exactly what they were supposed to with a non quality opponent. Everything was fluid. Smooth. TA has moxy. Intangibles are hard to find. If Martinez has turf toe then and a bad throwing mchanics then what good is he really? Is a healthy Martinex better than either one of the guys who played on Saturday? TA picked up 3 3rd and +8s. We stayed on scheule. When we do go back to Martinez in the bye week YOU WILL SEE THE DIFFERENCE. I think this is the reason we havent see much of either of them this year.....Bo wants to avoid controversey.I think we saw them in a game against a team that really isn't what we'd call a quality opponent. And while I think both looked great, Bo and the staff have also seen far more of all the QB's than we have. If they think TM is what we need to win, then I'm willing to trust that. I also know a lot of people are just gunning for TM to be replaced and won't be happy until he is, though.
I keep hearing this, but in what way did Beck dial down the offense? It seemed to me, and to Eric Crouch, that it was the same offense, except with a down field passing game. So if anything, he dialed things . . . up.We can throw it 15+ yards with accuracy now!
Let me correct your post and say we were able to throw it 15+ yards with accuracy TODAY..........what happens in the future remains to be seen!
And if Beck dialing it down is what created the flawless flow on offense TODAY, then maybe we should stick with that when TM comes back.....because there was a huge difference in the way the offense executed today vs the first 3 games this year.......maybe too much is being put on a 4 year starter despite those 4 years of experience that are so intangible.
Yeah, Im not afraid of a controversy........I had to go there!![]()
+1I keep hearing this, but in what way did Beck dial down the offense? It seemed to me, and to Eric Crouch, that it was the same offense, except with a down field passing game. So if anything, he dialed things . . . up.We can throw it 15+ yards with accuracy now!
Let me correct your post and say we were able to throw it 15+ yards with accuracy TODAY..........what happens in the future remains to be seen!
And if Beck dialing it down is what created the flawless flow on offense TODAY, then maybe we should stick with that when TM comes back.....because there was a huge difference in the way the offense executed today vs the first 3 games this year.......maybe too much is being put on a 4 year starter despite those 4 years of experience that are so intangible.
Yeah, Im not afraid of a controversy........I had to go there!![]()
And regardless of the opponent, there's no denying both Armstrong and Kellogg throw a better ball.
Tommy A throws a lot better than Tommie F ever did. So far I can give TF an edge on running ability, strength, and intangibles. However, the fact that we are even having this conversation should be an exciting situation. The funny part is the loyalists clinging to TM or that RK III should be the guy because he's a 5th year senior walk on. RK III can't run the full offense because he is very slow. That right there should be enough since it is pretty clear both guys can throw better than TM.Ok, I like Taylor, so there' s no 'Taylor-bashing' here but I wonder: Have we sacrificed former games because we didn't let these other two qb's play? I'm sorry but Tommy A. reminds me of Tommy F. That kid's got an arm! And Ron too! Oh my gosh! It was actually FUN watching that football game yesterday. I know, I know..it was SDSU However, there were other games in the past where you wonder if we could've won if Bo would've changed qb's? Just wondering. Any thoughts?