8 hours?! Well, then. Your finger must be right on that pulse. Personally, I'm relieved. I thought that we might be stuck in purgatory for awhile but you've reassured me that Pelini can get it done. Thanks.I listen to at least 8 hours per day of sport talk, . . .
Fair enough and I don't disagree, but if you don't think that feelers were put out for someone better last fall then I'd disagree.I think Eichorst opting to only give Bo his minimum raise with no contract extension is telling. He's far, far, far more in the know than Sipple and Benning ever will be. Their opinion on potential coaching candidates isn't going save Bo's job. Nor do I have any reason to believe they have the same people (or person) in mind as the actual athletic director.
Bringing home some hardware would save his job, but I think most of us realize that's probably not going to happen. Although, I think most would agree it would be the ideal scenario for the program.
If the ideal scenario doesn't come to fruition, it's best to keep your options open, regardless of naysayers like Sipple and Benning.
True. But again, I've asked for a realistic replacement that would be better, and yet nobody can name that person.Doesn't have to be better than them. It just has to be better than the current person.
Cool. First, please show me where I said that Bo will lead us any farther than what he already has.8 hours?! Well, then. Your finger must be right on that pulse. Personally, I'm relieved. I thought that we might be stuck in purgatory for awhile but you've reassured me that Pelini can get it done. Thanks.
Don't disagree except for the guarantees, there are no guarantees, see 2003.No one can name that person because nobody can guarantee anyone will be better. Well, i should not say i cant guarantee anyone would be better. There are some guarantees, but few. We only know what we have now, and what we wish we had. I think this point has been rehashed multiple times. Now if you want people to start naming coaches they " think" can do better, then hell, I could get a pretty strong list for you going right now. But why waste my time, I've seen the counter argument for that on this board a hundred thousand times already. We don't know how any coach would do. The excuses for why nobody could do better than Bo would flow out of the Bolievers asses that frequent this site like Carlitas enchiladas in Scary Movie.
Bo is the head coach.....until he isn't. Then we see who can and can't do better. Thats why you don't get your huge list of names.
Due to an inexperienced coaching staff, we ended with 9 wins last year when we could have had 10 or more. All it took, was a couple changes in the UCLA and Minnesota game, and the whole season could have been different. Its completely up to Bo to put his big boy pants on and make these changes if his assistants can't.I agree. Come on Bo, let's end the whole #9 wins thing.
What?Cool. First, please show me where I said that Bo will lead us any farther than what he already has.8 hours?! Well, then. Your finger must be right on that pulse. Personally, I'm relieved. I thought that we might be stuck in purgatory for awhile but you've reassured me that Pelini can get it done. Thanks.
I realize that you can't understand this, but at least my opinions are formed from 1) history and 2) people that currently have a helluva lot of more insight to college football than probably anyone on this board. Not by parroting random message board guy or from some pie in the sky ill informed opinion about the appeal and status of the program.
#9 wins![]()
#Imarepublicanbutibecameindoctrinatedatcollegenowispoutleftisttalkingpointsfrommsnbcandcnn#indepentthinking
If he wins 9 games, you just can't fire him, unless you already have a worthy coach willing to come here before hand. No coach would want to go to a school that you HAVE to win 10+ games every year to keep your job. I agree with the blowout losses, 100%, but his make it or break it thing, is more of a "make it competitive and quit embarrassing NU on national television". The only game we had, in my eyes, that was a blowout last year, was UCLA. Some say Iowa, but there is no way you could really believe we had that game in the bag with the position we were in. When they said RKIII was starting and TA wouldn't be playing due to an injury, I just went to support. I told so many Iowa fans that it was going to be a struggle for us because of the depth issues we had.I think for Bo this is a make or break season for him. If he can't atleast stop the multiple loss blowouts i do think he will be shown the door. We know he can do better. 2010 we had no blowout losses, 2009 only one. This is Bo's 7th year. If we suffer multiple blow out losses again this year, it would be the 4th year in a row. If he can't get the blowout losses to just 1 game this year or preferably 0, unless it's about money, i don't know how any proud program could keep this kind of coach even if he is winning.
I think the problem Pederson had when he fired Frank is that i don't think he made the right argument for firing Frank. If Frank had off the field issues he should have pushed that hard to other potential coaches instead of making it about surrendering the Big 12. Coaches would have been more sympathetic and would have understood. Now if Eichorst does fire Bo he should make it about the multiple blowout losses, the way he acts on national tv, the constant theme of fumbling, etc. I don't think that any coach would disagree about that. Yeah last year we only had 2 blowout losses with the easy schedule. But this year we have Fresno St, Miami, Michigan St, Wisconsin, Iowa. A little bit more loaded. Bo does need to fix the depth issue and not use it as a excuse. Ever year it can't be about depth. That means you aren't recruiting right. I support Bo but Bo has to dig himself out of it. I hope this year he does good and breaks some trends he has had the past couple of years but not going out of the way just to keep a guy.If he wins 9 games, you just can't fire him, unless you already have a worthy coach willing to come here before hand. No coach would want to go to a school that you HAVE to win 10+ games every year to keep your job. I agree with the blowout losses, 100%, but his make it or break it thing, is more of a "make it competitive and quit embarrassing NU on national television". The only game we had, in my eyes, that was a blowout last year, was UCLA. Some say Iowa, but there is no way you could really believe we had that game in the bag with the position we were in. When they said RKIII was starting and TA wouldn't be playing due to an injury, I just went to support. I told so many Iowa fans that it was going to be a struggle for us because of the depth issues we had.I think for Bo this is a make or break season for him. If he can't atleast stop the multiple loss blowouts i do think he will be shown the door. We know he can do better. 2010 we had no blowout losses, 2009 only one. This is Bo's 7th year. If we suffer multiple blow out losses again this year, it would be the 4th year in a row. If he can't get the blowout losses to just 1 game this year or preferably 0, unless it's about money, i don't know how any proud program could keep this kind of coach even if he is winning.
2 of those 5 games are huge. Fresno St, who only had the season they did last year, losses their elite QB. Its not going to be easy for them to get a guy in and do what they did.Yeah last year we only had 2 blowout losses with the easy schedule. But this year we have Fresno St, Miami, Michigan St, Wisconsin, Iowa. A little bit more loaded. Bo does need to fix the depth issue and not use it as a excuse. Ever year it can't be about depth. That means you aren't recruiting right. I support Bo but Bo has to dig himself out of it. I hope this year he does good and breaks some trends he has had the past couple of years but not going out of the way just to keep a guy.