carlfense
New member
Under either set of circumstances Brown was denied a fair trial. He'll never have that trial.
Hopefully the officer will.
What's the biggest reason for Blacks not advancing
- Thread starter BigRedBuster
- Start date
Hopefully the officer will.
carlfense
New member
It wasn't a line. I don't/didn't understand what lo country was asking in the quoted post.
BIGREDIOWAN
Mods
When we release something, we release something, we don't try to hide anything, but we've never had the need to or had an event like this occur before either.
BIGREDIOWAN
Mods
Really? Can we really believe anything we're reading from the news source right now? Give me a break.........
walksalone
New member
I always get a kick out of folks that have never been in situations that LEO's or soldiers find themselves in, but yet take the time to take the moral high ground. Not to mention casting judgement on a situation they only have second hand knowledge of because they were not there...
It'sNotAFakeID
New member
Last I checked, the news sources weren't the ones sending tear gas and rubber bullets into what were peaceful protests.
It'sNotAFakeID
New member
How'd they come to the conclusion that Mike was a potential suspect in the robbery case? EDIT: See that there is video surveillance of what could be Mike Brown. However, the officer who shot him had no clue he was a potential suspect in the robbery case. That's a very big factor.
Last edited by a moderator:
It'sNotAFakeID
New member
walksalone
New member
tschu
Banned
First off we are still dealing with a incomplete picture of what happened, And I think we should all wait to make any rash decisions much like what happened with the Trayvon Martin death.
Secondly regarding the cop knowing if Michael brown was a suspected strong armored robber. For the wording I heard during the police press release, was that the officer didn't know the description of the suspect at the time of the officers FIRST contact with Brown. But it is entirely possible that after he first confronted the two men that his radio came across with th discription which led to the physical interaction of The officer and brown.
I hope everyone allowed more information to come out before attacking either of the men involved I this case, let's not turn this into duke or any number of other news based tragities.
Secondly regarding the cop knowing if Michael brown was a suspected strong armored robber. For the wording I heard during the police press release, was that the officer didn't know the description of the suspect at the time of the officers FIRST contact with Brown. But it is entirely possible that after he first confronted the two men that his radio came across with th discription which led to the physical interaction of The officer and brown.
I hope everyone allowed more information to come out before attacking either of the men involved I this case, let's not turn this into duke or any number of other news based tragities.
It'sNotAFakeID
New member
I don't think anybody here is attacking either party. I think we are all saying our thoughts and then defending them with what evidence is known. Nothing wrong with that. I'll change my tune if evidence comes out that the cop was actually in the right and that Brown presented enough of a danger to use deadly force. For the time being, I don't think that was the case.
There are reports out there that Brown might have been involved in a robbery. That's fine, but it doesn't change anything because the officer did not know that Brown was a potential suspect. So the police releasing that information is to me an attempt at justifying their potential brutality by saying that x officer was doing a service to the community.
There are reports out there that Brown might have been involved in a robbery. That's fine, but it doesn't change anything because the officer did not know that Brown was a potential suspect. So the police releasing that information is to me an attempt at justifying their potential brutality by saying that x officer was doing a service to the community.
It'sNotAFakeID
New member
Apologies for having an opinion, sir. It won't happen again, sir.
You see, sir, the only way any of us can view this situation is through our own eyes and our own backgrounds, sir. I can only imagine how I'd react if I was in a similar situation, sir. And sir I don't think I would have shot Mike Brown, sir. I understand that cops have a different background, sir, and that that background leads them to maybe reacting differently in similar situations. But sir I think that even most cops would disagree with mystery cop's actions towards Mike Brown, sir.
carlfense
New member
Is that quiet criticism of how the Ferguson PD is handling this? Because they are hiding things.