Nebraska vs USC

Looking forward to a close game - if you're willing to accept information from a visiting Trojan, here's an idea what to expect.

Trojan offense has struggled most of the season to find an identity. The base offense is a pro set that wants to be a spread, usually run out of the shotgun (or pistol). Base tempo is a no huddle that often seems to stall - Sarkesian is torn between wanting to run 100 plays a game and knowing that his defense has no depth and needs him to run clock. Typical scenario has been an offense that is explosive early (big first quarter leads), then goes into a shell trying to run the ball (frequently unproductively) while the lead dwindles. USC lost two conference games by being unable to run enough to kill the clock and hold a lead (Arizona State beat us on a Hail Mary on the final play of the game, Utah drove the length of the field in the final minute and scored the winning TD with 8 seconds left).

Kessler is a smart QB, good game manager, rarely makes mistakes. He's shown a tendency to focus on his first read (usually Nelson Agholor), but can really go off when given time. He's had huge games against weaker competition which sort of inflates his stat line, but he's struggled some against better defenses (Stanford, Utah). Lots of talent at WR, and lots of speed (George Farmer and Steven Mitchell are both coming off knee surgery and are just know finding their stride). Thin at TE with Randall Telfer (a senior) and Bryce Dixon (true freshman) the only scholarship tight ends on the roster.

Buck Allen is an under-rated back, not shifty but with lots of top end speed and good hands out of the backfield. Justin Davis has a little more juke (but less size) and although he has run well late in the season sometimes struggles in pass protection. We've had way too many negative yardage running plays, usually when the line breaks down. We've not been able to pound the ball when we need to, and we seldom use the fullback as a lead blocker anymore.

OL has had some good games and some mediocre ones. We lost our starting LT to a knee injury during the Utah game. We'll probably be starting three true freshman on the O-line for the bowl game (never a good thing). Zach Banner has been solid at right tackle, and Max Tuerk has been good at center (although he's had some occasional snapping issues - before this season he was a tackle and guard). The three frosh are Toa Lobendahn who shifted from left guard out to left tackle when Chad Wheeler went down, Damien Mama at left guard now, and Viane Telemaivo at right guard. In a year or two this will be a very good offensive line, but they're very young right now.

The defense has played well for the most part, although many are unhappy with new DC Justin Wilcox. We lost our best edge rusher to an ACL injury before the season and have struggled to get a consistent pass rush. Leonard Williams is an absolute beast, but he's been fighting double and triple teams all season. For the most part we have played well against the run, but nose tackle Antwuan Woods tore a pectoral in practice and had surgery last week. The D-line is going to be shuffling bodies around trying to find what works (and there aren't many bodies to shuffle).

Hayes Pullard is solid at MLB, maybe a bit undersized. We lost Lamar Dawson for the season at the other inside backer spot and Anthony Sarao hasn't shown the physicality to plug up the middle. Senior J.R. Tavai is a classic "tweener" who just seems to make plays - he'll likely be playing an outside rush spot for the bowl game. Scott Felix has a big motor but gets blown off the play too much and struggles to keep contain.

The cornerbacks have done well. Kevon Seymour is much improved, and true freshman Adoree Jackson will be a first round pick one day (but not yet). The safeties have been a bit dinged up. Senior Gerald Bowman is a big hitter, Leon McQuay has struggled in coverage (see UCLA game) and John Plattenburg is a true freshman.

The defense has seemed to wilt late, possibly the result of not having enough depth. They've really had trouble stopping anybody in the fourth quarter with the game on the line. If it's a one score game and you've got the ball late, you've got to like your chances.

The kicker, Heidari has good range but has been inconsistent. He can kick a last second game winner (Stanford each of the last two seasons) or shank a 30 yarder. Probably needs a new swing coach. The punter Kris Albarado has done well for the most part - sometimes its difficult to tell what they've asked him to do. He has a big leg but seems to aim his punts more than boom them.

Algholor can be a dangerous punt returner, and Jackson is an electric kick returner. Soma Vainuku is a heat-seeking missle on coverage.

All of that is probably more than you wanted to know. USC fans are hoping that Sarkesian has been learning as he goes and will remember the Notre Dame game attack plan. If Sark gets a lead and goes into his shell, I don't like our chances. Lots of respect for the Cornhuskers, not expecting anything less than a classic.

(note: haven't always been a Trojan - I grew up in Ames, Iowa. The first Nebraska game I ever saw was a 3 point loss by the Cyclones, think it was in 1961)

 
I go to usc, my dad went to nebraska and I was raised a nebraska fan so I've watched very minute of the Big Red since I can remember. I've only been a trojan fan since I started school. Like a lot of people said, buck Allen is pretty underrated. He can run, not like Ameer but very few can. The defense lacks depth which hurt us all over this year which I didn't really understand/believe until I saw it. I think our corners will have their hands full because agholar is unreal and farmer, juju smith, Bryce Dixon and adoree Jackson are all so talented that anytime SC passes it's dangerous. Especially because, like the guy above me said, kessler makes minimal mistakes. It's unreal how safe he is with the ball and how good his decisions are. I think we can put up some points against the Trojans but our defense will be facing some tough challenges. Sc just has so many weapons. But plenty of people have stopped or stalled tgem this year so hopefully the blackshirts can. The defensive depth is what really hurts them even though they have some unreal players. As someone who has watched every second of both teams play this year, my worthless two cents is that SC has far superior talent and could run away with it but it will depend on Tommy and ameer staying on the field. As far as what I've heard on campus, nobody is truly that excited from what I've seen. After UCLA stomped us and we beat notre dame most of the fans kind of found a bright spot and left it at that. (I know I say "we" about both schools, just a big supporter of both if that's legal haha). Go big red

 
I've watched most all of USC's games this year.

They can score pretty easily when Kessler gets time - a lot of time on rolling out. USC is 15h in the nation in passing...but only 70th in rushing. You can run on USC - see Boston College and UCLA games...that's the blueprint, control the ball and keep Kessler off the field.

Like I said before, USC's run game is pedestrian. If Nebraska just sits back with their linebackers like usual - USC can eat them apart on short passes.

Nebraska will simply have to attack and blitz and take their chances and have to be able to pound it.
This is a good assessment. I live in SoCal and have watched USC and talk shop with their fans. We cannot give Kessler a lot of time or he will pick us apart, so us not having Gregory will be bad for our pass rush. We will need creative blitzes. USC's WR's will destroy our LB's with short routes so I expect USC to take advantage of this mismatch. Ameer will need a big game and I think he will only have it if our OL plays one of their best games...they'll need to do so for us to win.

 
I've watched most all of USC's games this year.

They can score pretty easily when Kessler gets time - a lot of time on rolling out. USC is 15h in the nation in passing...but only 70th in rushing. You can run on USC - see Boston College and UCLA games...that's the blueprint, control the ball and keep Kessler off the field.

Like I said before, USC's run game is pedestrian. If Nebraska just sits back with their linebackers like usual - USC can eat them apart on short passes.

Nebraska will simply have to attack and blitz and take their chances and have to be able to pound it.
This is a good assessment. I live in SoCal and have watched USC and talk shop with their fans. We cannot give Kessler a lot of time or he will pick us apart, so us not having Gregory will be bad for our pass rush. We will need creative blitzes. USC's WR's will destroy our LB's with short routes so I expect USC to take advantage of this mismatch. Ameer will need a big game and I think he will only have it if our OL plays one of their best games...they'll need to do so for us to win.
Gregory is playing. Was cleared and practiced this week.
 
I'm trying to get a take on our chances against USC. I know there are Husker fans here who are from CA and could comment on this. What have we heard? I've heard that their quarterback may be a challenge from us but little else. Would love to talk about football again since the 'BoGate II' and 'Gangwish vs Raccoon" talk has lessened. (Not that it wasn't interesting...but
default_deadhorse.gif
.)

Thanks!
Christmas came early.

I would love to see the Huskers get there first win against USC. (I believe NU never beat USC) Really I hope would pull the fans together.

I do not know much about USC this year. I know traditionally they are good...

 
BlitzFirst said:
We're gonna get killed. Papuchis has only called plays for a half, 2 years ago. Beck is going to try to show off for a new job, and we'll lose something like 38-17.
You have no actual confirmation that this took place or is true. So your conclusion is based upon unsubstantiated claims.
I can actually confirm Pap called that half when Bo went to the hospital.
 
BlitzFirst said:
BlitzFirst said:
We're gonna get killed. Papuchis has only called plays for a half, 2 years ago. Beck is going to try to show off for a new job, and we'll lose something like 38-17.
You have no actual confirmation that this took place or is true. So your conclusion is based upon unsubstantiated claims.
I can actually confirm Pap called that half when Bo went to the hospital.

Sure, that's evident. But what cannot be proven is that he ONLY called plays for that half and didn't for the rest of his time at Nebraska. That is just speculation.
Ok, fine. For the vast majority of his career, Papuchis didn't call plays. Bo did (he actually has the play sheets) and JP signaled them in. However, you're welcome to prove me wrong via video footage.

 
Anyone who thinks this team is not going to be motivated to win this game is crazy. They will play hard and I also expect to see some of the defense play with some scrappiness.

 
BlitzFirst said:
BlitzFirst said:
BlitzFirst said:
We're gonna get killed. Papuchis has only called plays for a half, 2 years ago. Beck is going to try to show off for a new job, and we'll lose something like 38-17.
You have no actual confirmation that this took place or is true. So your conclusion is based upon unsubstantiated claims.
I can actually confirm Pap called that half when Bo went to the hospital.

Sure, that's evident. But what cannot be proven is that he ONLY called plays for that half and didn't for the rest of his time at Nebraska. That is just speculation.
Ok, fine. For the vast majority of his career, Papuchis didn't call plays. Bo did (he actually has the play sheets) and JP signaled them in. However, you're welcome to prove me wrong via video footage.

Burden of proof is on the person making the claim. You have to prove absolutely that Paps didn't call any of the plays other than that half. Good luck on your quest.
There is no more evidence showing JP calling plays under BP than there is for Me, Charlie McBride, or Elvis.

But, just to make sure, I just rewatched every Nebraska game under Bo Pelini, and yup, he didn't call plays outside of the ASU game.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
BlitzFirst said:
BlitzFirst said:
BlitzFirst said:
We're gonna get killed. Papuchis has only called plays for a half, 2 years ago. Beck is going to try to show off for a new job, and we'll lose something like 38-17.
You have no actual confirmation that this took place or is true. So your conclusion is based upon unsubstantiated claims.
I can actually confirm Pap called that half when Bo went to the hospital.
Sure, that's evident. But what cannot be proven is that he ONLY called plays for that half and didn't for the rest of his time at Nebraska. That is just speculation.
Ok, fine. For the vast majority of his career, Papuchis didn't call plays. Bo did (he actually has the play sheets) and JP signaled them in. However, you're welcome to prove me wrong via video footage.
Burden of proof is on the person making the claim. You have to prove absolutely that Paps didn't call any of the plays other than that half. Good luck on your quest.
Since I didn't make a claim, I guess I would point out that I never once noticed Pap calling the plays on TV. It was always Pelini calling the plays with JP signalling them in. Is there just one instance you can think of Pap calling the plays outside of the time Pelini left the game?
 
Back
Top