It is going to be so weird adjusting to a team that doesn't have to waste the first two drives warming up.
How much better do you think we should expect them to be? 8 games last year we scored on our first drive. Of the 5 we didn't, several games we scored on our second drive.
No team does it every single game.
Which 8 games were those and which 5 were the others.
Look at the....boy I hate to say this, MSU game from last year. First team we faced that was a legit threat. It took 3 quarters of football for us to finally settle in.
My point was I get the feeling we should see a stronger team from start to finish, hopefully one that plays all 4 quarters like the game is on the line.
Scored on first drive.
Florida Atlantic
Fresno State
Miami
Illinois
Rutgers
Purdue
Wisconsin
Minnesota
Did not score on first drive.
McNeese State (scored TDs on next two drives)
MSU (Cluster f***)
NW (missed field goal on next drive)
Iowa (missed field goal on next drive)
USC (scored field goal on next drive and TD on third drive)
There are good and bad teams in both groups. Maveric had a much better break down than I did.
The offense starting strong wasn't that big of a problem last year. You pick out the MSU game. Well...that was a cluster f*** on many levels from the start.
In every single other game we played we either scored on the second drive or was in position to score if it weren't for a missed field goal. In McNeese State and USC, we scored on the next two drives.
Our offense didn't have a problem "getting warmed up" at the beginning of games last year.