We did see some. Far fewer than I expected though.Really interesting to me that we didn't see any kind of zone read/option plays.
By my count, the coaches called five designed quarterback run plays - one draw, one traditional option and three zone reads (one of which resulted in a critical fumble).
Good points. From that HOL article that BRB posted a link to, 77% of the times they lined up under center they ran, 84% of the times they lined up in shotgun they passed. Maybe this is a by-product of blending in Beck's offense but it seems like something easy for defenses to key on. Probably not an issue in the BYU game since nobody knew what the offense was going to look like. Going forward they probably need to get more creative and mix things up.Two things on the running game that I agree with and have been mentioned.
1) We have got to get more creative with it. I believe we will. For good reason, the coaches keyed on the passing game in practice before this season. Now, they need to balance that out and give our guys (O line) a better chance at success by being creative and mixing it up more.
2) I like the run game from under center much better than out of shot gun. It allows the RB to get to the line faster and hit the hole with a head of steam. In the shot gun, he has to stand there and wait for the ball before he can take off. The jet sweep also works much better from under center.
So, right now, from under center they have an RB up the middle or the jet sweep. That allows the defense to basically only have to defend half the field. What they need to do moving forward is develop a mis direction play out of that so the LBs and safeties can't just flow to the jet sweep. If they ran something like this, I missed it.
Yeah, the one true option play worked great - TA with a nice fake and some good yards. The one zone read look was fumbled. so not so good. I don't remember the others. They must be in the second half.We did see some. Far fewer than I expected though.Really interesting to me that we didn't see any kind of zone read/option plays.
From the article I linked.
By my count, the coaches called five designed quarterback run plays - one draw, one traditional option and three zone reads (one of which resulted in a critical fumble).
think it was in the second half, they called a zone read where, had TA kept it he had room to run for days. instead he gave the ball to the back and lost several yards.Yeah, the one true option play worked great - TA with a nice fake and some good yards. The one zone read look was fumbled. so not so good. I don't remember the others. They must be in the second half.We did see some. Far fewer than I expected though.Really interesting to me that we didn't see any kind of zone read/option plays.
From the article I linked.
By my count, the coaches called five designed quarterback run plays - one draw, one traditional option and three zone reads (one of which resulted in a critical fumble).
Yeah, you're right. That was a pretty bad read.think it was in the second half, they called a zone read where, had TA kept it he had room to run for days. instead he gave the ball to the back and lost several yards.Yeah, the one true option play worked great - TA with a nice fake and some good yards. The one zone read look was fumbled. so not so good. I don't remember the others. They must be in the second half.We did see some. Far fewer than I expected though.Really interesting to me that we didn't see any kind of zone read/option plays.
From the article I linked.
By my count, the coaches called five designed quarterback run plays - one draw, one traditional option and three zone reads (one of which resulted in a critical fumble).
Good stuff. I liked that our third possession was so clean we decided to have another third possession.![]()
It sounds like QB depth is really shaky. Hopefully it's a much better situation by next year, or maybe even by midseason, but that's optimistic. Really, not running the QB won't stop him from getting hit and injured either. It's a risk to manage.Why do you think coaching staffs don't allow Tommy to run traditional option plays more? It seems to me that he does a pretty dang good job running them. The one he ran this game was awesome. I think he is more natural running that type of option than a read option.
It's a head scratcher. He's pretty natural at it, and can carry out the ball fake as smooth as a guy with the same name but different spelling.Why do you think coaching staffs don't allow Tommy to run traditional option plays more? It seems to me that he does a pretty dang good job running them. The one he ran this game was awesome. I think he is more natural running that type of option than a read option.