Kernal
New member
#YOLO Those were just two of the many tricks Tommy learned from Taylor!Tommy also had two elementary school intentional groundings that were costly.
#YOLO Those were just two of the many tricks Tommy learned from Taylor!Tommy also had two elementary school intentional groundings that were costly.
I'm sorry, I'll let you guys sit in here and pump sunshine and rainbows. No adverse discussion allowed. I did say he did "some really good," but that doesn't fit your narrative.Its an appreciation for Tommy Armstrong thread.There is a difference between criticism and really not wanting Tommy to succeed. Can you tell the difference?Theres just a couple handfuls of people on this board that really, really don't want to see Tommy succeed.
That is a very nice way of leaving out the difference between 8.0 yards per carry and 0.2 (and 2 TD and zero).One defense also had one of the worst secondaries in the nation, the other did not.They both ran 9 times and Taysom out yarded him.
Tommy also had two elementary school intentional groundings that were costly.These are your comments.I don't think Tommy did a terrible job by any means. I think he was about on par with what we've seen from him in the past. Some really good, a cannon for an arm, some really bad, and questionable decision-making.
We can all criticize. Its the guys who have never acknowledged anything the guy does well, that's who I have an issue with.
You did say he has a cannon for an arm. My bad...that changes everything.
For a minute I thought you just came in here to debunk any positives said about the guy.
As for this, there was a short discussion about this on a radio show here called Drop the Mic with Mike Welch and he talked about how the doubters of Armstrong would rather be proven RIGHT about him than see Nebraska succeed. As crazy as that sounds, I think he might be right. People would rather be right, than have Tommy prove they don't know what the f#*k they're talking about.Is there any Husker fan that really doesn't want to see Tommy succeed, let alone a couple handfuls?
BYU was #114 in passing yards allowed per game last year. They have two defensive back starters back and two that basically didn't play for BYU last year - not sure if that is good or bad.Using this message board's preferred pass defense stat, BYU had the 66th ranked pass defense last year. Mediocre, but not one of the worst in the nation. Not sure how that translates into one of the worst secondaries in the nation this season.
That one was maddening. He had a lot of open field in front of him and a lot of time. I hope these are the teaching moments that Riley is talking about. I never got the vibe he was instructed not to run. There were a (very) few designed runs and even Tommy's patented hurdle-the-tackler.His first one, though, is something I'd expect better out of him. He had several seconds of time waiting where he could have easily thrown it away, but he got too greedy and tried to throw it away last second after a defender had tracked him down, and was unable to get the ball far enough because of it.
I wonder why they're ranked so low to start the year? Who ripped them apart like that?Not sure how that will translate to this year but they're currently #103 in the nation in passing yards allowed so that doesn't sound too good.Using this message board's preferred pass defense stat, BYU had the 66th ranked pass defense last year. Mediocre, but not one of the worst in the nation. Not sure how that translates into one of the worst secondaries in the nation this season.![]()
Don'tBYU was #114 in passing yards allowed per game last year. They have two defensive back starters back and two that basically didn't play for BYU last year - not sure if that is good or bad.Using this message board's preferred pass defense stat, BYU had the 66th ranked pass defense last year. Mediocre, but not one of the worst in the nation. Not sure how that translates into one of the worst secondaries in the nation this season.![]()
Not sure how that will translate to this year but they're currently #103 in the nation in passing yards allowed so that doesn't sound too good.![]()
I can honestly say I heard it here first.To hell with it Mike Welch. Do it now.
As aN Armstrong Defender I proclaim. TOMMY FOR HEISMAN!!!!!!!
That's what bothered me. He could have run 10 yards, easily. He doesn't seem to want to run unless it's a designed run. Either that or he's not comfortable making the decision to run. He ran so well last year when he bothered to do it. I wish he would run 10 more times per game. If the other team had to worry about it, then the throws would become easier.That one was maddening. He had a lot of open field in front of him and a lot of time. I hope these are the teaching moments that Riley is talking about. I never got the vibe he was instructed not to run. There were a (very) few designed runs and even Tommy's patented hurdle-the-tackler.His first one, though, is something I'd expect better out of him. He had several seconds of time waiting where he could have easily thrown it away, but he got too greedy and tried to throw it away last second after a defender had tracked him down, and was unable to get the ball far enough because of it.
I hope he gets more comfortable with the touch throws, particularly the screens. I really like how Langsdorf used them, but we have to connect.
For a quarter or two, Tommy looked really good. I was impressed.
No doubt. Right after the game I had the mindset that he had played pretty well with the exception of the 2nd qtr. Then after some thought, I think I over estimated how well he played. 2 turnovers, bad. 2 bad grounding penalties, 1 where he could have taken off and had a nice gain. Still seemed to force a few too many throws, and didn't seem comfortable in what little zone read game we ran.I think TA can be a good QB if he uses his feet. He has to take off when the yards are there.
I think its more of defining the offense. The new staff does not know how to use the zone read, so it did not look good. They need to scrap it and find a different way for Tommy to run that they understand.No doubt. Right after the game I had the mindset that he had played pretty well with the exception of the 2nd qtr. Then after some thought, I think I over estimated how well he played. 2 turnovers, bad. 2 bad grounding penalties, 1 where he could have taken off and had a nice gain. Still seemed to force a few too many throws, and didn't seem comfortable in what little zone read game we ran.I think TA can be a good QB if he uses his feet. He has to take off when the yards are there.
He played well enough for us to win, but those same old bugaboos from the past 2 seasons were there. He needs to clean those up, cuz as he goes the offense goes.