Why do people think an AD needs to be fired if one of his hires doesn't pan out? Does your company fire it's HR manager every time one of his/her hires doesn't work out? Of course not.
The whinging on this board is reaching epic proportions.
This is a good point that I don't really understand either. Especially in sports. Sometimes you make bad decisions and it's indicative of you being bad at your job, but sometimes you make good decisions that don't work out, because there are SO many uncontrollable elements that go into sports. Bo Pelini was a good decision to hire by Osborne. That didn't work out. Does that make that a bad hire? Not at all.
The weirdest thing is how the collective online sentiment keeps doing complete 180's, and then every step along the way it's like, "Okay NOW we know what we're talking about."
"I'm really impressed with Eichorst's press conference. Seems like a man that knows exactly what he's doing and exactly what he wants. Poised, cool, calm and collected, and he made the right decision."
"LOL WHAT THE f#*k WHO THE HELL DID WE JUST HIRE?! THIS IS A JOKE!" - We know what we're talking about
"Okay I'm starting to think that maybe this isn't such a bad hire after all. I overreacted before but now I'm level-headed."
"I am SO excited about Riley's potential to be a great coach. Hired a great experienced staff, always did more with less and with no resources, this guy is a stud, I know this for sure despite the lack of concrete evidence either way."
"Riley is straight up garbage. How can any of you think a career .500 coach would be any better than .500? I can't believe we settled for this. Saw this coming a mile away."