Talent is one, and only one part of the equation. Coaching scheme is another part. Coaching nuts and bolts is another part. "Want to" is another part.
Way back when, I was in the Armored Cavalry, tasked with being the first line of defense if the damned Rooskies decided to invade Western Europe. When I got there, my first Captain was a 'Nam holdover. When we trained, he would get livid at the slightest failure. He'd literally threaten you with physical violence if you didn't execute properly. We'd score 98-100% on the quarterly DoD proficiency tests. To the man, we privately despised the Captain. But we were skilled and we performed well over regs.
Then the Captain rotated out and a new one took his place. He was a book born officer, no combat experience and generally a nice guy. Our first DoD test with the new Captain we graded at 73%. A failing score. The Captain told us we'd need to improve. Training was lackluster. Our second test, 77%, failing. The new captain took us to the training range and addressed us all. "I know your past scores, you are all top notch soldiers, capable of excellence. We don't train to get high scores on tests, nor to make me look good. A good score won't matter if the commies come through the gap. You will fight like you train. I am a captain in the Cavalry, I will be at the front of the charge and most likely to die. You train so that the man on your left and right can have confidence you will be able to do your job, and they can be confident you will do yours."
We got the message. Next testing...98%. He never yelled or raised his voice. He just made it clear that it was on us to perform.
Somehow I don't think the coaches and this team have made that connection.