Husker Psycho
New member
Maybe tommy should have gotten on Langsdorf about his execution... and they could have walked out together.
Can't really blame the players, the coaches have been inventing ways to lose all seasonEek. That isn't good to hear...
Tommy also didn't play at all against Purdue.Ummm TA didn't play DB against BYU.Yahtzee, common denominator = TA....Us to actually win the games we should statistically win.We just went head-to-head with the number 3 team in the country. Three weeks ago we beat a top ten team. What the hell do you want?No. Three more practices with this staff could really set us back heading into next year. This is one case where less is more.
BYU: Led the game 28-27 with :03 left. Lost on a Hail Mary.
Miami: Rallied in the 4th quarter to force OT. Throw an INT on the first play of OT, with a bonus unsportsmanlike penalty to essentially give Miami the win.
Illinois: Led 13-7 with :55 left. No timeouts for Illinois and Tommy is given the option to pass, which he so happily complies with, throwing an incomplete pass to an albeit open Devine Ozigbo. Given the sieve the secondary was at that point, Nebraska was bound to give up the big pass play, and they did, and lost 14-13.
Wisconsin: Led 21-20 after Wisconsin missed a FG with 1:30 left. Wisconsin has all 3 timeouts, and Nebraska runs 3 uncreative totally predictable plays up the middle, running a total of :25 off the clock. Given the sieve the secondary was at that point, Nebraska was bound to give up enough plays to put Wisconsin back into field goal range, which they did. Wisconsin hits a FG and wins 23-21
Northwestern: Held the ball for almost 18 more minutes (note: football's a 60 minute game), ran 30 more plays than Northwestern who was playing a true freshman QB and had just gotten beaten senseless by Michigan and Iowa. Lose 30-28.
Purdue: Going up against the worst run defense in the Big Ten with a backup QB, Nebraska throws the ball an astounding, mind-boggling 55 times in a 55-45 loss, which required a 4th quarter rally after being down 42-16.
Iowa: Nebraska ran 39 more plays against the Hawkeyes today and held the ball for 13 more minutes (note: football's a 60 minute game). In a windy day, Nebraska scored just 3 points when going against the win and held Iowa, a team who had excelled on 3rd down ALL SEASON LONG to 0/8 on 3rd down. But no, 4 interceptions from Tommy Armstrong quelled any chance of another Nebraska upset.
The common denominator is the coaching staff. This program has won more than they had lost with him at QB the previous 2 seasons.
Agreed. You sum up my feelings perfectly. I think he was the best option we had this year.Tommy cannot help but hurt us in big situations. I am ready for POB. I HATE being the blame the QB guy, but holy hell Tommy.
That's right, a first time starter did.Tommy also didn't play at all against Purdue.
And our brilliant coaches had him throw 50 passes that game.That's right, a first time starter did.Tommy also didn't play at all against Purdue.
Tommy has been finding ways to lose games all season.Can't really blame the players, the coaches have been inventing ways to lose all seasonEek. That isn't good to hear...
My reply was directed at the poster who said the common denominator in all of our losses was TA.I'm not a fan of his play at the QB position but pinning the Purdue loss on him is a special kind of stupid. We lost to Purdue because despite facing one of the worst rushing defenses in the country we chose to throw the ball some 50 times with a first time starter. If the Purdue loss isn't a shining example of bad game planning and use of personnel I don't know what is.That's right, a first time starter did.[/size]Tommy also didn't play at all against Purdue. [/size]
The QB spot is unique and critical to an offense . . . look at the difference a QB change made for Iowa this year! Honestly, there have been some games this season that TA's shortcomings have created losses. One could easily argue that TA alone lost the game with Iowa . . . but, that's football sometimes. We'll see what the fall brings, I guess, but I'm fairly certain TA won't be the starting QB at the end of next season.3 year starter beating out a true frosh. It does sound highly unlikely.Seriously? It's possible, I suppose, but it looks unlikely.I got money on TA starting as a senior