It was kind of a funny story that they went and revisited the verbiage, changing the name to make things clearer. They started out thinking tagging it as a run play, on top of knowing the situation, would be enough.This is a classic case of a "call plays that work" mentality. When the play works as designed no one says a thing, but let it get screwed up and by gawd the coaches need firing!Remember how much discussion we had on that play after the Illinois game? Odd that no one mentioned the same play--run correctly--after the Michigan State game. I guess there's nothing to discuss when things are executed correctly, huh?...none, Riley said, hit the team harder than the collapse at Illinois. The third-and-7 play in which Nebraska, almost assured of victory if it had just burned more game clock with a running play, had some kind of disastrous mix-up that resulted in a bootleg pass from Armstrong.
Riley and offensive coordinator Danny Langsdorf changed the name of the play after that game so there wouldn’t be any confusion, and even used it for a touchdown against Michigan State. The new name: quarterback sweep.![]()
Boooo. Very discouraging.There isn’t a lot of chutzpah or fanfare to how Riley will approach the next nine months after a 5-7 season. He said he doesn’t plan for any staff changes.
If he doesn't and we are not much better than this year. Mike could very well be gone by year 3.There isn’t a lot of chutzpah or fanfare to how Riley will approach the next nine months after a 5-7 season. He said he doesn’t plan for any staff changes.
Could you imagine the article that Riley would write about this year?I bet Coach Riley could do a hell of a lot better job writing an article than McKewon could do coaching a football team.
Ha! Thanks!Post 20 ... +1. Got a good chuckle out of it. Very true.
I guess I don't understand the line of thinking that a coach would ever look at his team and coaching in the off season and say, "Well, that's good Enough". Whether a team is 12-0 or 0-12 or somewhere in between the coaches will always do self evaluation and look at things they can do better. Are there people out there that think coaches don't try to improve themselves and the way they do things in the off season?This is a great article and like FTW said, it touches on several topics we've discussed here. This article shows that the coaches are doing something, they are making changes and trying to get better.
"Probably not"?!?! How about, "Hell f'ing no!" Jesus, this guy went into the 2015 season thinking 5-7 was a real possibility. Nebraska is going to go anywhere until Charmin pulls his head out of his a$$, starts benching malcontents, and shifts to a power-run offense that relies on the run to setup the pass, not the other way around.It doesn’t mean Riley, when reviewing the 2015 season, is satisfied. When asked if he thought Nebraska would finish 5-7, Riley said, “Probably not.”
Why would he make changes? We aren't going to fire him after one year so why should he fire any assistants after one year?Is anyone really surprised that Riley isn't planning on any staff changes. These are his best buddies. He is gonna ride it out with them, for better or worse.
Ask any number of people on this board that think Riley and his staff are doing nothing to help the team.I guess I don't understand the line of thinking that a coach would ever look at his team and coaching in the off season and say, "Well, that's good Enough". Whether a team is 12-0 or 0-12 or somewhere in between the coaches will always do self evaluation and look at things they can do better. there people out there that think coaches don't try to improve themselves and the way they do things in the off season?This is a great article and like FTW said, it touches on several topics we've discussed here. This article shows that the coaches are doing something, they are making changes and trying to get better.
Some of you guys are just searching for any molehill out there to make a mountain of it.Not sure what article you guys read, but that actually eroded even more of my confidence in Riley. This says it all:
"Probably not"?!?! How about, "Hell f'ing no!" Jesus, this guy went into the 2015 season thinking 5-7 was a real possibility. Nebraska is going to go anywhere until Charmin pulls his head out of his a$$, starts benching malcontents, and shifts to a power-run offense that relies on the run to setup the pass, not the other way around.It doesn’t mean Riley, when reviewing the 2015 season, is satisfied. When asked if he thought Nebraska would finish 5-7, Riley said, “Probably not.”
How did you make that leap?Not sure what article you guys read, but that actually eroded even more of my confidence in Riley. This says it all:
"Probably not"?!?! How about, "Hell f'ing no!" Jesus, this guy went into the 2015 season thinking 5-7 was a real possibility. Nebraska is going to go anywhere until Charmin pulls his head out of his a$$, starts benching malcontents, and shifts to a power-run offense that relies on the run to setup the pass, not the other way around.It doesn’t mean Riley, when reviewing the 2015 season, is satisfied. When asked if he thought Nebraska would finish 5-7, Riley said, “Probably not.”
The defense and secondary was a complete mess for most of the year, and a lot of people thought the coaching staff did a pretty poor job with the team overall.Why would he make changes? We aren't going to fire him after one year so why should he fire any assistants after one year?Is anyone really surprised that Riley isn't planning on any staff changes. These are his best buddies. He is gonna ride it out with them, for better or worse.