Exactly why the 2015 squad would win by 35+, and a halftime interview from Bo saying "WERE FINE!" and a post game presser of "We just didn't execute against ourselves".'14 squad has Abdullah, Gregory, Bell, and (a healthy) Pierson-el. I'd take '14 by 2 scores.
Yet somehow after all these "issues" you point out with Pelini.......he managed to win 70% of his games while Riley remains a .500 coach. I realize it's the "in thing" to bash Pelini, but it would help the cause if Riley would start winning.Limited to <= 1, because as QMany said - Pelini is going to defend the pass and dare Langsford to run...and I think he runs 75/25 split so TA's attempts (opportunities for mistakes) are greatly reduced. 15' wins if Pelini drops 6-7, and rushes only 4 w/ his "contain" DL scheme - which you know is how he would play it.
This is the thing with Pelini's D that bothered me, it was easily exploited because it was defended in such a lopsided way to one component of the game. It became glaringly obvious when the BTN did the interview w/ the Minnesota DC (IIRC), I think before our game, and he essentially spelled out how he was going to beat us with motioning a man out of the backfield then run up the middle and use short crossing routes across the middle all game. Sure enough, it was there all day.
Plus, lets not forget the jet sweep...a huge component of Riley's offense and essentially a guaranteed 10 yards against Pelini's D.
He won the games he was supposed to win (Riley certainly didn't I'll give you that), but he often got blown out in the others. 14' versus 15' isn't a slam dunk game, which is why I'd take the 15' team. Almost every evenly matched game was a loss for Pelini. At least Riley has been able to step up and win some games against quality opponents.Yet somehow after all these "issues" you point out with Pelini.......he managed to win 70% of his games while Riley remains a .500 coach. I realize it's the "in thing" to bash Pelini, but it would help the cause if Riley would start winning.Limited to <= 1, because as QMany said - Pelini is going to defend the pass and dare Langsford to run...and I think he runs 75/25 split so TA's attempts (opportunities for mistakes) are greatly reduced. 15' wins if Pelini drops 6-7, and rushes only 4 w/ his "contain" DL scheme - which you know is how he would play it.
This is the thing with Pelini's D that bothered me, it was easily exploited because it was defended in such a lopsided way to one component of the game. It became glaringly obvious when the BTN did the interview w/ the Minnesota DC (IIRC), I think before our game, and he essentially spelled out how he was going to beat us with motioning a man out of the backfield then run up the middle and use short crossing routes across the middle all game. Sure enough, it was there all day.
Plus, lets not forget the jet sweep...a huge component of Riley's offense and essentially a guaranteed 10 yards against Pelini's D.
Riley couldn’t outcoach an interim Illinois coach or Darrell Hazell. Our run D last year wasn’t as bad as our current passing D. 2014 wins.2015......Riley outcoaches Pelini
That interim Illinois coach has a name sir!!!Riley couldn’t outcoach an interim Illinois coach or Darrell Hazell. Our run D last year wasn’t as bad as our current passing D. 2014 wins.2015......Riley outcoaches Pelini
Who did this guy ever outcoach?Riley couldn’t outcoach an interim Illinois coach or Darrell Hazell. Our run D last year wasn’t as bad as our current passing D. 2014 wins.2015......Riley outcoaches Pelini
BILL CUBIT AND DONT YOU FORGET IT!That interim Illinois coach has a name sir!!!Riley couldn’t outcoach an interim Illinois coach or Darrell Hazell. Our run D last year wasn’t as bad as our current passing D. 2014 wins.2015......Riley outcoaches Pelini
Oh yeah, you're right, I have no idea who he was either.