Poll: Who Wins, '15 vs '14 Nebraska?

I am surprised, again, by people's delusions. It's as if you forgot the entire season. I'll remind you: we had a losing record, and was so bad, we were very close to achieving the worst record in most of our lifetimes.

Now somebody insert a Debbie Downer gif pronto.
You realize the OP was asking who would win if the teams played in a bowl, right? Just as there's no question this was a poor season overall, it's clear that the team largely played better football to end it.
He clarified that later, but it still wouldnt have changed the result. 14 would have destroyed 15 (just by less). We matched up well with ucla (largely, a result of smaller defense players and an unexcited ucla team) and not much more. But if you think we could do that to our dl last year, you are crazy. Once that's out, we are left to our passing (and in case you forgot, TA is the one passing).

Oh, and before you say it, our 15 running game was not like Wisconsin in 14.

 
Uhm....since McNeese State could line up to thwart Ameer Abdullah, I'm thinking the much improved rushing D of '15 could do the same, daring Tommy Armstrong '14 to beat them with his arm.

Which he might do.

Or not.

While Tommy '15 tested the '14 Husker defense with the mobile QB antics that often drove them crazy.

Or not.

I'm confused.

 
I am surprised, again, by people's delusions. It's as if you forgot the entire season. I'll remind you: we had a losing record, and was so bad, we were very close to achieving the worst record in most of our lifetimes.

Now somebody insert a Debbie Downer gif pronto.
You realize the OP was asking who would win if the teams played in a bowl, right? Just as there's no question this was a poor season overall, it's clear that the team largely played better football to end it.
He clarified that later, but it still wouldnt have changed the result. 14 would have destroyed 15 (just by less). We matched up well with ucla (largely, a result of smaller defense players and an unexcited ucla team) and not much more. But if you think we could do that to our dl last year, you are crazy. Once that's out, we are left to our passing (and in case you forgot, TA is the one passing).

Oh, and before you say it, our 15 running game was not like Wisconsin in 14.
Based on your response to my clarification check above, I'm guessing you probably hadn't noticed that I picked '14 (to win) myself.
default_wink.png


 
I am surprised, again, by people's delusions. It's as if you forgot the entire season. I'll remind you: we had a losing record, and was so bad, we were very close to achieving the worst record in most of our lifetimes.

Now somebody insert a Debbie Downer gif pronto.
You realize the OP was asking who would win if the teams played in a bowl, right? Just as there's no question this was a poor season overall, it's clear that the team largely played better football to end it.
He clarified that later, but it still wouldnt have changed the result. 14 would have destroyed 15 (just by less). We matched up well with ucla (largely, a result of smaller defense players and an unexcited ucla team) and not much more. But if you think we could do that to our dl last year, you are crazy. Once that's out, we are left to our passing (and in case you forgot, TA is the one passing).
Oh, and before you say it, our 15 running game was not like Wisconsin in 14.
Based on your response to my clarification check above, I'm guessing you probably hadn't noticed that I picked '14 (to win) myself.
default_wink.png
You are right. Sorry.

 
I am surprised, again, by people's delusions. It's as if you forgot the entire season. I'll remind you: we had a losing record, and was so bad, we were very close to achieving the worst record in most of our lifetimes.

Now somebody insert a Debbie Downer gif pronto.
You realize the OP was asking who would win if the teams played in a bowl, right? Just as there's no question this was a poor season overall, it's clear that the team largely played better football to end it.
He clarified that later, but it still wouldnt have changed the result. 14 would have destroyed 15 (just by less). We matched up well with ucla (largely, a result of smaller defense players and an unexcited ucla team) and not much more. But if you think we could do that to our dl last year, you are crazy. Once that's out, we are left to our passing (and in case you forgot, TA is the one passing).
Oh, and before you say it, our 15 running game was not like Wisconsin in 14.
Based on your response to my clarification check above, I'm guessing you probably hadn't noticed that I picked '14 (to win) myself.
default_wink.png
You are right. Sorry.
No worries - just happy to find people to agree with on here once in awhile...
default_smile.png


 
Literally the WORST argument you could possibly make after THIS season. But honestly, I don’t get why these arguments are brought up constantly. LOL HE DIDN’T GET A JOB HE SUCKS! I bet you are also one of the guys that says OSU HIRED BECK EVEN THOUGH HE SUCKS! ARE THEY STUPID!

But does anyone honestly believe that the 2015 defense stops AA and our passing offense from 2014? TA would look like a Heisman candidate out there.

Why is that a bad argument? There were more head coaching vacancies across the country than any time in recent history, at good, great, decent, medium, and bad schools. There were even articles from beat writers about why their schools should hire Pelini.

As far as the 2015 defense stopping AA, really wouldn't be all that terribly difficult, considering how much we were thwarted by the likes of McNeese State and Michigan State and Purdue. Our 2014 offense, especially the passing game, was successful because of Ameer's threat. As soon as he was contained even a little bit, the passing game suffered mightily.

 
Back
Top