Douschebag Hall of Fame

The day we land 2 commits, one being #1 safety Lamar Jackson, C N Red pisses and moans what a disappointment this class is.

Douche
I didn't complain about the class being a disappointment, I was just a little disappointed with missing out on Fitz, Simmons, and Allen/Fant/Bisharat to really buoy the class. I am happy with the class, just lamenting what it could have been. So Douche you turd mongrel.
You said: "Can't lie. 1 out 3 of Jackson, Fitz, and Simmons really hurts this class and makes me question wtf we are doing"
Fant: Never wanted to come here

Fitz: Dad never wanted him to come here

Simmons: Chose late push from NCRU Clemson

Allen: I feel we could have had this one

Bisharat: We recruited him for what, 12 hours?

The fact we were even in it til the end with these guys is a huge improvement over what we had just a couple cycles ago. Yeah, had a few more gone our way it woulda been nice, but thats recruiting. Yet you question WTF we are even doing?
Ya. It does make me question. I'm not condemning anybody, just wondering about a few things. I also made it know in the Fitz thread that I feel his Dad and him played us. Things are much more complex than you would like to point out. I can question the staff but still back them. They don't have to be mutually exclusive.
If I didn't question, then I would just be a yes man like many people on here apparently have no problem being. Everything is great, don't question anything.

I feel good about the class. But losing Fitz and Simmons didn't hurt the class some? Am I missing something?

I don't just follow to follow, I prefer to ask questions and know what's going on. Just b/c I'm on board, and am ready to do my part to make Nebraska great again, doesn't mean I don't still have my own thoughts and questions about some things that go on.

I guess I'm just not near as great a fan as you are.
If it makes a difference, I consider you two equals when it comes to douchery

 
The day we land 2 commits, one being #1 safety Lamar Jackson, C N Red pisses and moans what a disappointment this class is.

Douche
I didn't complain about the class being a disappointment, I was just a little disappointed with missing out on Fitz, Simmons, and Allen/Fant/Bisharat to really buoy the class. I am happy with the class, just lamenting what it could have been. So Douche you turd mongrel.
You said: "Can't lie. 1 out 3 of Jackson, Fitz, and Simmons really hurts this class and makes me question wtf we are doing"

Fant: Never wanted to come here

Fitz: Dad never wanted him to come here

Simmons: Chose late push from NCRU Clemson

Allen: I feel we could have had this one

Bisharat: We recruited him for what, 12 hours?

The fact we were even in it til the end with these guys is a huge improvement over what we had just a couple cycles ago. Yeah, had a few more gone our way it woulda been nice, but thats recruiting. Yet you question WTF we are even doing?
Ya. It does make me question. I'm not condemning anybody, just wondering about a few things. I also made it know in the Fitz thread that I feel his Dad and him played us. Things are much more complex than you would like to point out. I can question the staff but still back them. They don't have to be mutually exclusive.
If I didn't question, then I would just be a yes man like many people on here apparently have no problem being. Everything is great, don't question anything.

I feel good about the class. But losing Fitz and Simmons didn't hurt the class some? Am I missing something?

I don't just follow to follow, I prefer to ask questions and know what's going on. Just b/c I'm on board, and am ready to do my part to make Nebraska great again, doesn't mean I don't still have my own thoughts and questions about some things that go on.

I guess I'm just not near as great a fan as you are.
Never said I was a better fan, but I obviously struck a nerve since you jumped to that.

I'm fine with people questioning things when the situation allows it. You chose poor wording I guess at a bad time. We just finished a strong class and your comment came across as overly negative.

 
If it makes a difference, I consider you two equals when it comes to douchery
It couldn't make less of a difference
We agree on this.
And how about the sh#t show in the "OWH: Can Nebraska Be Nebraska Again" thread. cm husker and cornographic in the same thread are bad enough, but then some others have joined and really helped the douchery.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If it makes a difference, I consider you two equals when it comes to douchery
It couldn't make less of a difference
We agree on this.And how about the sh#t show in the "OWH: Can Nebraska Be Nebraska Again" thread. cm husker and cornographic in the same thread are bad enough, but then some others have joined and really helped the douchery.
I stayed outta that mess. Personally, I think any school can relive its own glory days, it just takes the right staff at the right time. What that whole article translates too isn't "Can Nebraska be Nebraska again?", it's really "Can Nebraska win another National Championship and compete on a yearly basis again?". Identity is only important to tradition when you are losing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If it makes a difference, I consider you two equals when it comes to douchery
It couldn't make less of a difference
We agree on this.And how about the sh#t show in the "OWH: Can Nebraska Be Nebraska Again" thread. cm husker and cornographic in the same thread are bad enough, but then some others have joined and really helped the douchery.
I stayed outta that mess. Personally, I think any school can relive its own glory days, it just takes the right staff at the right time. What that whole article translates too isn't "Can Nebraska be Nebraska again?", it's really "Can Nebraska win another National Championship and compete on a yearly basis again?". Identity is only important to tradition when you are losing.
Agree again. Its not about doing what we did when we were winning. Its about finding out now what we need to do to compete consistently for conference championships which will lead to competing for NCs. I dont agree it has to be what we did in the 90s, not saying it couldnt be, but definitely doesnt have to be. I really want a dominant defense again though. Offense i really dont care as long as its efficient and can score enough points to win.
 
If it makes a difference, I consider you two equals when it comes to douchery
It couldn't make less of a difference
We agree on this.And how about the sh#t show in the "OWH: Can Nebraska Be Nebraska Again" thread. cm husker and cornographic in the same thread are bad enough, but then some others have joined and really helped the douchery.
I stayed outta that mess. Personally, I think any school can relive its own glory days, it just takes the right staff at the right time. What that whole article translates too isn't "Can Nebraska be Nebraska again?", it's really "Can Nebraska win another National Championship and compete on a yearly basis again?". Identity is only important to tradition when you are losing.
I haven't engaged in many conversations in the Football Forum lately. There's so much leftover outrage from that shitshow of a season, and people don't know how to express all of it, so they're lashing out at each other. It's unfun, so I'm sitting it out until things calm down.

 
Basically my plan as well. I would love to discuss what could be this season, yet I fully understand any actual attempt at discussion will be met with some level of negativity and I just don't have the energy right now for day long pissing match debates.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If it makes a difference, I consider you two equals when it comes to douchery
It couldn't make less of a difference
We agree on this.And how about the sh#t show in the "OWH: Can Nebraska Be Nebraska Again" thread. cm husker and cornographic in the same thread are bad enough, but then some others have joined and really helped the douchery.
I stayed outta that mess. Personally, I think any school can relive its own glory days, it just takes the right staff at the right time. What that whole article translates too isn't "Can Nebraska be Nebraska again?", it's really "Can Nebraska win another National Championship and compete on a yearly basis again?". Identity is only important to tradition when you are losing.
Agree again. Its not about doing what we did when we were winning. Its about finding out now what we need to do to compete consistently for conference championships which will lead to competing for NCs. I dont agree it has to be what we did in the 90s, not saying it couldnt be, but definitely doesnt have to be. I really want a dominant defense again though. Offense i really dont care as long as its efficient and can score enough points to win.
Exactly. The offense can be whatever the hell it has to be to suit the players on hand and the staff at the helm. Couldn't really care less if it is working well enough to stock pile W's. Defenesively, we all know a dominant line and physical pass rush is necessary to win here and against the Big Ten. I think the staff gets that too.

 
cm husker and HuskerPsycho for being complete idiots about the same topic but in the opposite directions. And also both for not realizing they don't have a clue what they're talking about.
I have difficulty believing they're that obtuse/stubborn. They must be trolling at this point.

 
Back
Top